Worst display or not, to be fair, Liverpool didn't deserve to lose. Liverpool had a perfectly legit goal disallowed and had some of the best chances of the game.
Still a long way to go until we meet but to me City don't look nearly convincing as they are made up to be.
Not sure how you can say it was a disallowed goal. The flag had been up ages, whistle had gone, Hart didn't even try to stop him. He might have scored but we will never know for sure. Might have ended up a penalty, a red card for Hart, or a save. We just don't know. It was a poor offside decision but not a disallowed goal.
Liverpool had some good chances but Hart saved well from Coutinho and Johnson. Sterling blazed over when he should have shot on target, but also Navas hit the post with a header.
Liverpool also conceded the two goals that City scored. That is why they lost, no other reason. If you don't score your chances or defend well enough do you really deserve anything from game?
Not a scintillating performance from City by the standards recently set, but with Negredo and Kompany performing well it was still a very good performance against a very good Liverpool team brimming confidence.
Let's see how they get on at Chelsea.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk 2
