CL Round 3: Barca - Bayern 4-1
- Thread starter Birdy
- Start date
Ter Stature
Active member
Bayern had several chances in the box, they all blasted them into nowhere.
Terrible offense aside from Kane.
Madrid would definitely have scored more.
Grande
Member
Ask your therapist what "projecting" word means, because that's what you are doing rn.
No, you probably know what that word means. You sound like another pseudo-intellectual lame guy so you probably know many words. Sadly, cant operate them properly to create adequate perception on reality around you, due to your mental disorder and just-alittlebit-above average IQ
ZenI
Professor Balthazar
Dude take a chill-pill. Why you even buggin? I dont have problem with you if you don't really have a problem with me... If it all was a misunderstanding let's bury the hatch. We cool?
Loki
Well-known member
Grande
Member
I dont like provocative language, both straightforward and ironically from people I dont know
Anyway fair enough, we cool
TemporaryFan
Active member
Lol. Szczęsny is chanting in Spanish already too.👍🤠
ZenI
Professor Balthazar
What other big moments did Bayern have?
Loki
Well-known member
Best is Lewy is celebrating hard against his former side
Maradona37
Well-known member
Good to see you lads have sorted it out, Zeni and Grande, you both support the same team and are good posters. Better to get on, especially after a night like tonight. 
We have 2 big chances with goals from Raphinha and Lewandowski. Lewandowski had another big chance after Yamal's pass. Bayern's only one bigg moment - which ended with their goal. So why the hell is xG 2.2 VS 1.5?
Grande
Member
I feel like xG is useless stat when we are talking about one game. Maybe on a whole season scale xG can say something attention worthy. In terms of "which team created more dangerous situations" in specifically one game simple eye test is a better measure tool
Maradona37
Well-known member
Yes you're spot on there, great point - xG is a longer-term stat, not to be taken too seriously in isolated games. It can deviate a lot for a team game to game but will regress to the mean over a period of time.
Eye test is definitely better. For example that amazing cross (was it Lamine?) to Lewa that lewa couldn't get on the end of. That doesn't even count as a shot whereas a trickler from 30 yards does. It was a great chance but I bet it didn't register highly on xG.
xG has its uses but it is flawed too. Simply put, any human activity with so much movement, variables and situations can never be fully accounted for with stats - you need quantitative and qualitative data. The eye test still reigns supreme.
Temptation
Well-known member
Yup, he's definitely not joining Barca next season.
Home of Barca Fans
