A 20 year old Drogba was in French's 2nd division & made 0 goals in 2 apperances. Haaland is galaxies ahead of Drogba.
And I doubt Drogba would be worth 150M. He was inconsistent in his prime, scored 20+ league goals in 2 out of 8 seasons for Chelsea. Bar 09/10 (when he was 31 years of age), he was never in conversation as the best No.9 in the world. I wouldn't say Drogba was "loyal" considering he openly tried force his way out from Chelsea on numerous times (I do respect his honesty). In today's world with social media, a player would get 100x more backlash if he wants to quit on his team.
Good post.
There are some users here with some really weird bias against certain famous young players for various reasons, and consequently love to rate players far below the level of performances they're actually putting out. Whether it'd be bad luck with and therefor dislike towards Bundesliga players; or Dembele being placed as Mbappe rival in 2017, and we ended up gambling on the huge dud and missing out on the actual star; disliking short players; nostalgia, and so on.
Comparing Haaland to Drogba is just another one of the inane and frankly hilarious comparisons I've read here.