Agreed.
37 years old Joaquin is playing regularly for Betis (yes, he's a club legend and still very good at that age) so why would people expect Setien to drop 5-6 years younger Pique, Busi, Raki, Suarez?
I know, I was just refering to many people here believe having a high possesion is a sign of a good/attacking football. It could be but not always. When you're not creating chances a high possesion is useless as [MENTION=15376]DonAK[/MENTION] said and this is happening to Betis regularly this season. I prefer to have 55-60% possesion and create 3-4 good chances than having a 70% possesion and have 1-2 chances.
I like Setien from his days at Las Palmas. He's a good coach. But I think he became too conservative over the last season since he started to use 3-5-2. I've enjoyed watching Betis in first half of the last season when they've scored a lot of goals but they also conceded even more (remember that 3-5 win in Seville derby). He had to do something to improve them defensively and he did that when they bought Bartra last January and he decided to play with 3 at the back. I've expected him to get back to 4-3-3 with players like Carvalho and De Celso brought last summer but he sticked to 3-5-2.
Their struggles in the final third are probably also up to the players so it's not only Setien's fault. Sanabria is injury prone and Loren is looking like a one (well, more like a half-season) season wonder. And they don't have a good RWB. I still believe they would be better by using 4-man defense and Canales/Tello/Joaquin/Inui and recently singed Lainez as wingers. Now it seems Inui will leave this month. I was reading Betis fan forum yesterday and most fans are unhappy with that decision. There are also a lot of similar complaints there about Setien than we see here about EV. Obviously, this is just a fan thing because we always find something to be unhappy about. It's also easier to change a coach than half of the team. But overall I got an impression that majority of Betis fans wouldn't mind to see Setien go.
At the same time he's a fan favourite (according to the latest poll
http://www.barcaforum.com/showthread.php/15325-Who-do-you-want-as-Bar%E7a-manager-next-season ) to become our next coach and I believe the main reason for that is because Betis is playing with a high possesion that people here are obssesed with.
I wouldn't him if Valverde decides to leave at the end of the season but at the same time I think after 3-4 months here people would see Setien is not really who they expected him to be and most impatient fans would probably start to call for his head because he would still stick to the old guard/ because he would play Dembele as a wing-back or for other reasons.
As [MENTION=15376]DonAK[/MENTION] said I would also prefer Machin over Setien but his 3-5-2 might not be welcomed by the people who are convinced we should play 4-3-3 and 4-3-3 only. It's obvious Machin won't go away from a system that brought him success so if we would choose him we would know that from the beggining and we'd need to adjust our team.
Personally I would even take Eusebio over Setien right now though that's unlikely given how his episode at Barça B finished as I think he's still butthurt we've selected Lucho over him in 2014. I think he has developed as a coach over the last few years and has adapted now in Girona. He started with his prefered 4-3-3 but he saw after a few games things didn't go well so he got back to Machin's 3-5-2 that players are used to play. If you're managing at a smaller club and can't afford to buy players that fit your system as a coach you should adapt your system. And Eusebio has done that and it's working for Girona so far but a lot can change in second part of the season.
In opposite to general opinion on barcaforum I think Valverde has done a good job adapting too. We can financially afford to buy 95% (or more) of the players we want though we obviously can't buy them all so I'm not comparing us to Girona. But how many of the players we've bought in his 18 months here were explicitly signed on Valverde's request? Zero, though Paulinho and Vidal fit into his system well. And yes, I believe he has a system which is actually pretty good but people just don't like it because it's not primarily focused on possesion/control - here we go again.
As [MENTION=16942]BBZ8800[/MENTION] said many times our team is made out of leftovers from Lucho's (and previous coaches all the way back to Pep) team, we have/had last year a few players bought by some of our former sport directors and we've signed Cou, Arthur, Dembele and Malcom over the last year while Valverde has apparently asked for players like Parejo and Willian who he thought would fit better his idea of football. I don't think we've made wrong decisions by signing players we did (most of them anyway) but then it's hard to blame a coach for not getting the best out of the players he didn't want in first place. Valverde needed to adapt his way of thinking (and coaching) football to work with the players he has at his disposal and not the ones he'd rather have. No Barça coach had a full autonomy on the transfer market but previous coaches except Tata (who was against signing a CB because he believed Puyol will recover) got at least one player they wanted.
Pep made some terrible decisions on the transfer market (Ibra-Eto'o swap, Chygrinsky - he was so in love with his passing that he overlooked all of his other attributes that were not as good, Cesc, Hleb) but also some great ones like Alves and return of Pique. He was mostly successful because of his coaching talent and golden generation of La Masia though.
Tito wanted and got Alex Song as a CB. And then we've speed up negotiations to sign Neymar on his request IIRC though Tito sadly never had a real chance to work with him.
Tough to say who is responsibly for which signing but I think Lucho got his wishes fullfilled with Suarez, Mathieu, Gomes, probably Bravo as well (this could be more on Unzue or Zubi though).
So based on this it's pretty much a big hit or miss every time we let coaches decide who we should sign (but it's close to the same story when SD/other people inside the club were responsible for the signings as well) and I'm not saying we should let EV/future coaches have more autonomy on the signings, especially not at the club where coaches last 2-3 years at most. But at the same time I still belive it's better to give a coach one or two players who he wants than spent money on the players he doesn't want. It's impossible to compare our coaches situation to PL managers like Pep or Klopp who have built their teams exactly like they wanted so they can play their brand of football. Coaches at Barça don't have that luxury so they have to work with what they get and I think Valverde has done a good job so far so hopefully he'll stay.
People can call me Valverde apologist all they want. I admit I like him and would keep him over any of the options in the poll posted above. He's not perfect (no coach is) but i still believe too much **** is thrown at him after every game even when he actually doesn't do anything wrong.