He will earn what he's due. He got paid 16M less in the last 2 years, and now he will get them in the 4 next years (extra 4M/year). It's a big amount, and he was already on 14M/year which is high, but let's not act that he fucked the club over and took all the money. He just deferred payments, nothing else. If the contract was rich from the beginning, that's one thing, but people are getting at Frenkie's neck like he doubled his salary every year.
How about we deal with these sort of things internally for once? Every single detail about every single matter comes out through the press, and it's rarely making us look good.
MATS probably earns 2m. per big save.
Trust people to spin things so they don't have to pay, they should pay him what he's due, plus deferred, and then sell him if they want to.
Few things.
1-It is already confirmed by many journalists that legally Frenkie signed a new contract with new wage structure. That means that there is no deferred wage from legal standpoint. If he retires today he doesn't earn this money, unlike Busquets situation for example (he still earns money after he retires or leave in 2023)
2-There are conflicting reports about his salary and the whole new agreed wage.
Yesterday there is a reports that says 4 players took a total of 18M paycut, but the renewal was worth of 311M of additional money on the club.
That isn't a "club doesn't want to pay Frenkie 18M" theory at all.
If anything, if we want Frenkie's new contract voided, and he is owned 18M from past year, this means that now we actually own him money for past years and not vice versa.
Unlike the new contract, if Frenkie stop playing today he can get his money with immediate effect
In that case he must not be earning much.
Trust people to spin things so they don't have to pay, they should pay him what he's due, plus deferred, and then sell him if they want to.
2-There are conflicting reports about his salary and the whole new agreed wage.
Yesterday there is a reports that says 4 players took a total of 18M paycut, but the renewal was worth of 311M of additional money on the club. (additional salaries and years)
That isn't a "club doesn't want to pay Frenkie 18M" theory at all.
If anything, if we want Frenkie's new contract voided, and he is owned 18M from past year, this means that now we actually own him money for past years and not vice versa.
Unlike the new contract, if Frenkie stop playing today he can get his money with immediate effect.
But such reports says new contract is simply outrageous, not because of 18M,but because of additional years and salary.
So it depends on which reports you believe, but in both cases club actually has a point, and so does the player.
If you notice closely, Dembele had a delayed start but still managed to catch up with FdJ, and it didn't look he was trying too hard either. A lazy sprint from Demb?le.