Few points of contention obviously
1) Was Inigo necessary when Lenglet is still on the books and his future not solved? Considering Inigo injury history and all.
2) Did we need to bring in Gundy on such a high wage that it blocks a low amortization signing like F. Diaz or Fressy?
3) Did Alonso need to be renewed if Cancelo was the play?
4) Did Bob need to be renewed?
1- I would say yes, you can't be reactive at times, so securing Inigo allow us to get rid of Lenglet, a player that seems mentally checked out of Barca and the coach wants out.
Inigo injury history is good, except for last year.
The question here is whether medical team gave the ok for it or they were overruled? Only the later make it a wrong decision.
2- Gundogan is just on different level tbh, guy fit the team from day 1.
I wanted Diaz, but I mentioned that I don't see him as single pivot, Gundogan add much needed quality and experience to the team. I would also argue that his presence will help player's development, like Pedri and Gavi
3- Alonso shouldn't have been renewed regardless, bad player, no upside.
But I think it was agreed when he first signed and we didn't want to break the promise
4-No, but if he is in low wage, he ease the transition of team captains and keep some Catalan blood from the old guard. Political move but for low cost I can get it.