JamDav1982
Senior Member
Much needed information for you http://laligareferees.blogspot.fr/
Seen it before. Guessing that is Barca biased they try to make out ref gave Barca more decisions v Eibar ffs.
Much needed information for you http://laligareferees.blogspot.fr/
Seen it before. Guessing that is Barca biased they try to make out ref gave Barca more decisions v Eibar ffs.
Eibar did get more unclear or wrong calls go their way, but the ones that mattered went for barcelona.
I get you'd rather pass them off as dishonest to suit your arguments, but not everyone do things your way you know...
No they didnt and Barca got the biggest decisions of the match and cant equate that Alba dive with othe largely meaningless calls.
But you're the dumbie doing that, using quantity of calls going Eibar's way to try and paint it like the ref actually helped Eibar. Maybe stop contradicting yourself when pushing your agendas.
In terms of major decisions which is always those discussed the referee gave more wrong ones to Barca. The others are just biased crap hand picked for purpose of that site really.
Maybe try to be more honest than making statements you then prove false with a link.
That guy is biased can see it reading through.
Difference is that guy actually singled out any wrong or unclear referee decisions over 76 games, you're just stating your conviction.
But he is completely biased and have had a look at few of the games.
For example in last classico has Casimero as should have been sent off twice. That is not accurate and first tackle was bad but never a red.
Classico in Decemeber he makes out Carvajal should have given away a pen for handball then makes up excuse for Raki not giving away one about being fouled by Ronaldo when in reality both were not clear cut and borderline.
It is a Barca fan clear as day.
Real had some horrendous important decisions in their favour but that site is a load of crap designed for every game to show refs favouring Real and against Barca.
First off nitpicking isn't going to help your case as among the 500 + decisions discussed they are bound to misjudge some.
Secondly, even your cherry picked example suck, you're just making stuff up as always : they had Casemiro sent off once, not twice, and the argument was for a second yellow not given on a foul on messi, not a straight red.
You destroyed your own point by making false claims about the analyses and refusing to face that fact.
As the images are clear I don't have to add anything. Denying reality is your only resort left to try and salvage your least shit example somehow meant to show bias