You have no idea who was 'considered world class at time' and as I said it doesnt matter if others catch up after.
The Argentina teams were up there as strongest club sides in world at the time as were other top SA teams.
It is nonsense to make out it was 'Maradona and 10 others' and he won on own. Comes across as clueless cliches and not having any real idea.
Argentina with Maradona quiet were the better team in final. They were the best team in tournament and not just because of Maradona even if he gave all time world cup performance.
"The help Messi and Maradona received or didn?t receive doesn?t end there, and the truth is likely that neither player won or lost the World Cup for his country. It?s indisputable that Maradona outperformed what was expected of the chances he had throughout the tournament. But in the final, the highlights and the data will tell you his teammates filled that role. His offensive contribution was the fifth highest among Argentina players in the match behind Valdano, Julio Olarticoechea, Enrique and Burruchaga. Burruchaga, Valdano and Jos? Brown scored a goal each with a combined xG not quite reaching 0.5, meaning they scored about 2.5 goals more than expected among the three of them. In other words, in one match, the trio nearly equaled the expected goal plus-minus that Maradona posted in the five-match sample (+2.9).
Meanwhile, jump ahead to 2014 and Gonzalo Higua?n accounted for well over half of the scoring opportunity the ?14 team had with a 0.4 xG. His xG total was hundredths of a goal from the goal-scoring ?86 trio, so nearly identical. But Higua?n had nothing to show for it aside from an early goal called back for offside and two near misses that, on their own, each had a higher conversion likelihood than any of the three goals scored by Argentina in the ?86 final. His xG was actually a shade higher than 2014 Germany?s leader, Benedikt H?wedes, who, you might recall, missed Germany?s best chance of the match when he hit the post with a header off a corner near the end of the first half.
So Maradona not only had a more active midfield than Messi in the final, but he also had teammates finishing when he wasn?t. Which brings us to consider one chance from each match, on which Maradona and Messi played supporting roles.
Jorge Burruchaga scored a World Cup-winning goal with the last touch he had in the tournament. Assists weren?t an official stat until the 1994 World Cup, but anyone who?s seen highlights of the 1986 final knows who played the outlet ball to Burruchaga on the 84th-minute goal. It was a comparatively deep Maradona, and with deep data, we know that position to be from 2.0 metres behind midfield and 9.9 right of centre. Burruchaga?s first touch came 16.9 metres advanced of midfield and 10.9 right. He took three touches before his shot from 10.3 metres from the goal line and 9.7 metres right, which came with a 10.7 percent chance of scoring.
Twenty-eight years later, Higua?n was in on Germany keeper Manuel Neuer in the 21st minute of a scoreless match and took a one-time shot 16.4 metres from goal and a shade left of centre, which came with a 17.3 percent chance of scoring. It was Argentina?s best opportunity of the match. It came after Kroos ? ironically enough given his ball movement efficacy throughout the tournament ? played an errant header behind Germany?s back line following a Messi air challenge on Mats Hummels."
https://www.statsperform.com/resource/revisionist-mystery-messi-maradona-argentina-world-cup/