Like Terzic?For Bayern it doesn't but anyone challenging Bayern is historic.
Like Terzic?For Bayern it doesn't but anyone challenging Bayern is historic.
He bottled the biggest chance for Dortmund in decadesLike Terzic?
I think the reason clubs didn't go in for him is because he was allowed to "cheat" a little bit off the ball at Leicester, so the numbers would have suggested that he's a bit lightweight. Signing of the season so far though considering the money involved.Odd that a bigger team didn't go after Maddison. He is class for a good while.
MacAllister has been pretty bad. Never seen a 6 giveaway so many balls and get dispossed fairly easily. Thiago is a far better player for that positionOnly positive today is that City didn't gain any points and extend their lead on us today.
We're clearly better than the other teams so I am not worried.
Only looking at City.
Thankfully, our new signings have all landed.
Szoboszlai has been one of the best players in the league this season. Macca has been delightful. Endo and Graven doing well.
Joe Gomez is back and like a new signing. Finally have cover for Trent.
Terzic is a clown and Dortmund is too stupid to keep him.Like Terzic?
I can't believe that Diaz goal was disallowed.
How is it possible that VAR did not step in ?
Absolutely unjustifiable in any way. One can only think that it was done on purpose.
Whoever was at the VAR should be fired on the spot.
On ESPN they seemed to be suggesting that it was communication error. VAR booth saying it was OK meaning the goal, but the ref taking that to mean the on-field decision, so he allowed the game to play on with no check.I can't believe that Diaz goal was disallowed.
How is it possible that VAR did not step in ?
Absolutely unjustifiable in any way. One can only think that it was done on purpose.
Whoever was at the VAR should be fired on the spot.
You say that every other day so......rarest of w's for temptation
if so we are even beyond the ridiculous.... why they (VAR) didn't contact the referee again and tell him no offside, regular goal ?On ESPN they seemed to be suggesting that it was communication error. VAR booth saying it was OK meaning the goal, but the ref taking that to mean the on-field decision, so he allowed the game to play on with no check.
That is nonsensical. These motherfuckers are just trying to cancel VAR in the EPL, it's incredibly obvious.Tottenham 2-1 Liverpool: VAR believed Luis Diaz goal had been ruled onside
So it seems that once VAR guys realized their mistake it was too late to intervene.