Just wondering, why would that be such a bad thing? He has proven with our NT that he thinks LT since day one.
He isn?t a tactical mastermind but he found the best system for his best players quite fast and plays super attacking against team that are worse. Against big teams he uses the counter more (even then he is using Thorgan Hazard or Carrasco as WB)
He isn?t afraid to start young players in important games (Doku starting instead of Carrasco vs Italy for example.
While he isn?t afraid to drop players when they don?t perform anymore, I?m not sure if he would bench Busquets and Pique because he values a good vibe in the locker room.
I?m not saying that he should be our first candidate but I find it normal that he is one of the names being mentioned.
Well, the fact that he won't bench Busi and Geri is enough of a reason.
Then, he does not have the profile IMO to lead the project of Barca. I don't see any previous work where I can see outcomes that resemble what this team needs in terms of both football and results. A good year at Everton, and a good year at Wigan, at club level should not be enough
Compare with what Ten Haag has to show at club level.
NTs are different story and it's really hard to assess the whole of an NT manager and transpose it into hypothetical club-level work.
In his case, I am not sure he utilized the best generation of Belgium players to their highest potential.
That semi-final loss against France was disheartening. France under Deschamp is bad, offers only a low defensive block. There was no tactical tinkering and improvisation to find solutions, when players like prime Hazard, De Bruyne and Lukaku were available.
Well, the qualifaction vs Brazil and vs Japan, were lucky enough to begin with
That's just one game, but in general Belgium seems to thrive in low-pressure situations (groups) and disappoint when the big games come
MAybe you have followed him more closely on his NT work, and wanna object to the above