Cox was wrong to include Xavi in that article as he hasn't been a deep-lying playmaker for fucking years. he's an all-pitch playmaker and in recent seasons has been getting forward a fuckload, especially this campaign. should have included Busquets instead, as he's a YOUNG deep-lying playmaker so could, along with Big JM, represent a revival of the position. and then there's Xabi to consider as well. basically I think he just wanted to write about Xavi, Pirlo & Scholes.
the similarities between Scholes & Pirlo are remarkable, and the two of them are certain on a par in terms of ability. but in terms of the last decade/15 years, Xavi is a class above everyone, but they are definitely next in line (along with Rui Costa & Riquelme, although they are mediapuntas rather than deep-lying playmakers).