Bobo32
Senior Member
I remember so well Rijkaards play - everytime against a competent opponent Barcelona would play the "U-shape" and it would often end in Ronaldinho half-faking for a freekick with his back against the goal, near the touchline and halfwayline.Trincao is too soft to be a b2b midfielder. At least someone like Rakitic had a bit of physicality.
We need a proper fucking hardman like Van Bommel. That's why I liked Rijkaards teams. There was always a blend of skill and physicality.
This was often Barcelonas way of getting the ball into the oppositions half. Sometimes Ronaldinho did something unbelievable and it changed some games, and the games would open up due to other stuff, but Barcelona were very often caught without any idea on how to progress the ball from the defence.
It was with Busquets arrival that Barcelona started to get the ball into the feet of midfielders in the final third with ease, that's when everything started to open up.
You can say it later became static, "handball-play", too hard to break through, but I much prefer having problems with the ball close to opp.area than close to your own area. I prefer opponents to be ultradefensive to having them play like PSG the other day.
Of course when having Vidal+Rakitic as interiors, you get little out of Busquets, and I have to say the same is true with Pedri+De Jong.
Edmilson/Marquez/Toure were great DMCs btw, really top class, and good technically. But they couldn't do what Busquets could, not close to it.