Should Barca pay 50 milion for Villa?

[Labinn]

Catalan newspapers said that Valencia's President will sell David Villa only if 50 milion comes?

Should Barca pay 50 milion by Villa?

 

[FCBTubi]

no, to much IMO.

 

[Beast]

It's a matter of necessity than option ATM , you broke all bridges with E2 and the only one who COULD do a similar job is Villa.. followed by Forlan.. one cost 50 the other will cost 40 ..

but i think u can get Forlan if u offer 30 + a player..

 

[Poor_Sunyol]

 

[sammy]

43 to 44 mil euro, that's the proper price.

 

[gvt2000]

As much as i like villa, i think 42 + loans is more than enough.

 

[Evil]

No. But do we have a choice ?

 

[Quash]

Oui, certament.

 

[M.L. King]

No, paying more than €30 million for him would be ludicrous. Maybe I'm exaggerating a bit, but I just cannot understand why should we splash that amount of money if we already have the best striker in the world. Instead of spending time on signing Villa, Txiki should try harder in order to persuade Eto'o in staying. We would save more money, plus the player all the players have voiced their opinion on the situation and want Eto'o to stay.

 

[0nur`barca]

The first choice would be Eto'o.. but should extend his contract this summer.. If no
We should buy Villa , but 40 mln€ + a player on loan would be enough . we shouldn't give more than that.

 

[Quash]

Really don't get that, wouldn't you love to see some new blood of such proven quality as Villa? Christ, in this market, he's worth more, if Kaka's worth 65m.

 

[Barcaman]

No. Too much for something we already have. Barca should resolve the Eto situation, look to other targets and then, if all fails: get Villa

 

[Guardian]

35M max

 

[VivaBarca]

50 million is to much. €40 million max.

 

[cardigan]

no. what's with henry-eto'o ?