During the Extraordinary General Assembly to approve the famous economic levers that will grant financial muscle to FC Barcelona, Joan Laporta assured the existence of an "anti-Bar?a law" that makes it difficult for the young promises formed at La Masia to rise to the Blaugrana first team . Although the president did not say any specific name, it is clear that he was referring to Gavi and Pablo Torre, who already wears a Bar?a shirt .
"Before we could register players under 23 years of age in our teams. Both in the B and in the Youth. Well, now they have made a law, surely anti-Bar?a because we have many young players, which will force us to compute these footballers for the 'fair play'", valued Joan Laporta. "If we follow the circular now, we will not be able to register it," he added.
Activated levers: the time of the signings
What is the main novelty of the meeting to renew Gavi?
The aforementioned law will make it difficult from now on for the young promises formed in the Masia to 'go up' and 'go down' freely . The happy 'fair play' will also condition the progress of the pearls towards the Camp Nou .
----
I thought this would be an interesting discussion. I am looking for the circula which explains this amendment so if anyone can find it on the LaLiga website (which is a steaming pile of shit) I would be delighted.
The gist is that LaLiga are making an amendment that B team players that promote will be affective of the salary cap. It is a measure to get around clubs registering players for the B team and then having them play for the A team. Laporta rather aggresively called it the Anti-Barca law yesterday saying that as things stand (without the sale of assets) we can not renew Gavi.
Now a few points from my observation.
-I need to see the circulars, because the rapid integration of this law/rule change for next season is something that the LaLiga clubs need to argue against or oppose. But at first it looks counter-productive to the attributes of having a B team, and obviously how they work. While an amendment probably should take place to stop abuse (read below about Real Madrid), there needs to be a balance that does not effect the organic (Gavi) or unexpected progression of a youth signing (Pedri).
-Calling it the Anti-Barca Law. It is more harming to Madrid than to Barcelona. But the timing of this seems to opportune with Barcelona finding financing outside the CVC
-Laporta stigmitizing this rule change because of Gavi. Gavi should be a first team player now and exist within the dynamics and salary cap of the first team. So him citing this rule change in reference to Gavi is more politicking than reality. But it may effect how Pablo Torre can be used next season, which this is rule change is more damning against.
-Why Now? Something I overlooked in the past, but Real Madrid may have the B team loophole for Fede Valverde, Reinier, Rodrygo and Vinicius (having looked at their B team registrations and first squad numbers it . 100m+ in signings with the transfer fees outside of the main club. Why didn't LaLiga come down at these points?
"Before we could register players under 23 years of age in our teams. Both in the B and in the Youth. Well, now they have made a law, surely anti-Bar?a because we have many young players, which will force us to compute these footballers for the 'fair play'", valued Joan Laporta. "If we follow the circular now, we will not be able to register it," he added.
Activated levers: the time of the signings
What is the main novelty of the meeting to renew Gavi?
The aforementioned law will make it difficult from now on for the young promises formed in the Masia to 'go up' and 'go down' freely . The happy 'fair play' will also condition the progress of the pearls towards the Camp Nou .
----
I thought this would be an interesting discussion. I am looking for the circula which explains this amendment so if anyone can find it on the LaLiga website (which is a steaming pile of shit) I would be delighted.
The gist is that LaLiga are making an amendment that B team players that promote will be affective of the salary cap. It is a measure to get around clubs registering players for the B team and then having them play for the A team. Laporta rather aggresively called it the Anti-Barca law yesterday saying that as things stand (without the sale of assets) we can not renew Gavi.
Now a few points from my observation.
-I need to see the circulars, because the rapid integration of this law/rule change for next season is something that the LaLiga clubs need to argue against or oppose. But at first it looks counter-productive to the attributes of having a B team, and obviously how they work. While an amendment probably should take place to stop abuse (read below about Real Madrid), there needs to be a balance that does not effect the organic (Gavi) or unexpected progression of a youth signing (Pedri).
-Calling it the Anti-Barca Law. It is more harming to Madrid than to Barcelona. But the timing of this seems to opportune with Barcelona finding financing outside the CVC
-Laporta stigmitizing this rule change because of Gavi. Gavi should be a first team player now and exist within the dynamics and salary cap of the first team. So him citing this rule change in reference to Gavi is more politicking than reality. But it may effect how Pablo Torre can be used next season, which this is rule change is more damning against.
-Why Now? Something I overlooked in the past, but Real Madrid may have the B team loophole for Fede Valverde, Reinier, Rodrygo and Vinicius (having looked at their B team registrations and first squad numbers it . 100m+ in signings with the transfer fees outside of the main club. Why didn't LaLiga come down at these points?
