Joan
Well-known member
It's an ongoing debate, time to post a poll.
1. Roberto. Many say he's better at the moment, but at the age of 26 - basically a finished product. His flaws are well known, so are his strengths.
2. Semedo. While it seems he hasn't adapted yet, it's believed his ceiling as a RB is higher. Also said to be a better defender individually. Main flaws being offensive output, linkup play.
Do you think we should go with Semedo hoping he picks up confidence and becomes a player the club expected him to - or a, generally believed, better RB atm?
* I tried my best not to sound biased. Including only popular opinions and well-accepted ones.
1. Roberto. Many say he's better at the moment, but at the age of 26 - basically a finished product. His flaws are well known, so are his strengths.
2. Semedo. While it seems he hasn't adapted yet, it's believed his ceiling as a RB is higher. Also said to be a better defender individually. Main flaws being offensive output, linkup play.
Do you think we should go with Semedo hoping he picks up confidence and becomes a player the club expected him to - or a, generally believed, better RB atm?
* I tried my best not to sound biased. Including only popular opinions and well-accepted ones.