Search results

Organising is very questionable to put the final essentially 3 days apart from one of the semi finals.

You should read the whole remarks. “We’ve seen that he’s a player who can handle the pressure,” Rabiot said this week. “He has a lot of quality. However, it’s always difficult to handle a semi-final in a tournament like this. "He has proven he can play just as well at international level as at...

What criticism did he send towards him?

What did Rabiot say that was so controversial? His remarks look pretty normal to me.

England been terrible once again for the talent they have. Their attack is abysmal.

True. More on him for thinking that a 39 year old Ronaldo should play two 120 minute games consecutively whilst showing terrible performance. Seems like the team controls him rather than the other way around. A manager's job is to make the tough decisions, not that benching Ronaldo is even...

Plays two consecutive terrible games, both in which he missed huge chances to qualify his team in regular time, then backchats to the crowd because he scored in the shootouts. It's sad to see a once amazing player play like this, frankly, he should retire before more damage is done to his legacy.

Hall of shame tournament from Ronaldo. Playing him likely led to their loss today. He should see this as a sign to retire. From what we saw in this tournament he doesn't have the level to play even for a team like Aston Villa, Newcastle, even West Ham. And that's ok. Father time comes for...

Surprisingly composed by Dembele

Ronaldo has been probably the worst striker at this tournament but is still somehow immune to being subbed off even in consecutive extra time games. The power of a name.

Could anyone who watched the Spain Germany game give me your summaries? Thanks for your time.

Sesko cost them the game. He had to finish at least one of those great chances.

Ronaldo is 39 years old. Let's just say he is not the player he once was and that's ok. Father time is undefeated. He's too old to be playing at a top level anymore especially given he leaned on his physical attributes heavily in his prime. He is currently mid table or EL level at best.

I think 60 or 70 is about right, that would mean England go through 6 or 7 times out of 10 against Switzerland, which I think is fair - although maybe 6/10 is more accurate.

England will be much better vs Switzerland. This was a wake up call and I think they will improve against an opponent who tries to challenge for the ball more. At the end of the day even though they played terrible they have the players that can just win games for them, similar to France, that...

Context matters... they were losing, struggling all game and about to go out. That goal is everything in context even if came against weak opposition on paper.

That kind of goal to tie a knockout game in the 95th minute... wow.

Southgate's England in general would go out against the first top opposition they faced every tournament but losing to a team with a combined market value that's less than one English player is really something now.

Bellingham is totally ineffective for England in the AM spot, he plays a highly designed role at Madrid that isn't replicated at all on the international level. Two contexts are totally different and the setup is tailored around him at Madrid.

Those 2 minutes with the ref decisions decided the game really. Denmark looked likely winners after the 1-0.