Search results

That sounds scary :(

Martinez's buyout is 30m. Plus, he wasn't that good last season.

Does he seriously think that 50 is too much for Benatia but that 40 isn't too much for Marquinhos? Or that 20 + tax isn't too much for Mathieu?

If that's true, then bid 50m for him. It's a better deal than 25m (or whatever 20m + tax is) for Mathieu. Or 40m for Marquinhos.

That was within their limit of 60m (if I'm not mistaken). IIRC, City's limit was lower.

:lol: It's like when people say that "Neymar has been shit all season".

Well, so much for us winning any trophies next season :lol:

City has the FFP to deal with.

Nope. Roma are not PSG. Only reason Benatia isn't a City player now is because City wanted Mangala. If a top club bids enough money for him, he's gone.

If they do that and the ban isn't lifted (which it won't be), it'll be moved to a more important part of the season.

This. People on this forum need to realize that some players just can't be bought. Hummels is another one.

I'm guessing it's their disastrous season that's causing them to spend so much. They never had one of those under SAF.

Benatia too expensive and Mathieu isn't? :lol: We have enough money to get Benatia. Remember, we have a 120m budget.

He needs to take the right-footed free kicks next season.

Anyone but RM :cry:

Oh :lol: I feel like such a dumbass right now :lol:

Wtf? :lol:

I'll never get over us selling him :(

Far from it. Xavi might leave and Roberto just isn't good enough. Which leaves us with just Rakitic, Iniesta and Rafinha.

Good backup? Yes. Worth 20m + tax? No. Barca starter material? No. Would him as our only CB signing be a good idea? No.