Search results

Ouch, the poor Barca fanboy, the English clubs significantly cut their competitiveness in the CL too, but they can deal with that, so what's wrong with Barca and Real? Are they afraid or smth? There is a reason why the EPL is the most successful league financially and there is a reason why they...

What a pretentious fool, Im failing to grasp economics of footbal blah, blah, hahahah, the same old bitch fighter who tries to win his cheap battles posting stats from blogs, hahah. Oh, I'm sorry Mr Economic genius, I wonder what you are doing in a football forum and how on Earth you're not...

again what a load of crap!! BHAHAHA Dude go back to your economic classes. You're talking like a manipulative politician who is trying to fool the dumb proletariat from the villages. HAHAHAH Sevilla may increase by only 6 or 7 M (which is good for them), but the OTHER, once AGAIN THE OTHER 13...

well, the standards in England are higher, first of all, and second, the small clubs in England are richer and they can keep their players unless they got the big money they want to. IThe stats you present are old, West Ham now are in the championship and dyer is not a part of their team...

What a load of crap. This is why Sandro wants to go on trial with Laporta, who seems has done the same shit that you are accusing the other presidents had done. Barca nd Real have made dumbest transfers in the history of football, that every club instead of them will go bankrupt, but things are...

Well, there's no need to have a brain to realise that having 10 bucks is much better than having 4.... You can plan your next 3 holidays, yehoooo!

One more thing Jatin are you kidding me? Spending 25M on Chygrinskiy, 80 on Ibrahimovich, and more than 50M on Caceres, Keirrison, Hleb and Henrique, and then selling them for 20-30% of their price and you say that successful business? Barca should thank Cruyff for his phenomenal work with...

This article exactly explains why the TV rights have to be devided more equally.

which is their fault. Well, this is capitalism you know, underwriters wouldn't risk and will provide only if there is a good back up. You know, the British somehow know how to deal with these things, looking at the ex-Spanish colonies in South America and then when you look at USA and Australia...

what does mean "visibily" :lol: The owners of Birmingham and A. Villa, as well as the ones of Sunderland and the rest are rich enough, at least these teams have nothing to worry about finances. Funny how even the lower league attracts more investors. When every team in EPL gets a huge load of...

and which government is not corrupt? the italian? :lol: anyway, I'm disappointed that Rayo Vallecano don't have any bee on their shirts. they were so cool with bees :( also, I disagree that leagues are predictable, nobody knows what will be the gap between Real, Barca and the third team. 25...

Raed, your post is pretty awesome, and as much as I wanted to bitch about it (because you're Madridista, and we all knw that's all madridistas are wrong :p) I actually agree with every bit in it. I agree about the clubs websites, the fair TV revenues, the eccentric bosses, TV cameras...

ah. the good ol' football forums :) Everyone is bitching about something and trying to win internet bitch fights :) I missed that for long time

absolutely brilliant video, mate :)

lol! lol! It's Malaga and Getafe vs Birmingham, Man city, Chelsea, QPR, Blackburn, A. Villa, Liverpool, Leicester, Sunderland - all owned by foreign investment and sugar daddies Which is more attractive? tbh wouldn't call the Getafe owners sugar daddies, they look scourge

then you're right :)

marketing, infrastructure, taxes, boobs, it's all part of the management.

Well there is a reason why the sugar daddies prefer investing in shitty EPL teams rather than big La Liga ones. And it's the most popular league, because it's well managed don't you think? L'pool also can put a fight

Ah, the romantic times with SuperDepor :not_i:

They reached the semifinals in 2001 :)