Search results

You're right. He just took illegal drugs, putting the reputation of his teammates, coach and club into question. Because there's always that time of the year when players take illegal drugs willy nilly like its no big deal, right? Unlike a transfer window where transfer requests and refusal to...

If he's "unhappy", its probably likely that he won't be starting any time soon.

That's the problem with putting all your eggs in one basket. Liverpool have also done the same with their CB needs resting on signing VVD. Clubs should always have a solid Plan B. Otherwise, shit like this happens.

Did he submit a transfer request? Did his "dream club" come calling for him?

Again, its not exactly the same situation with Coutinho. Its a transfer window and Barca are actively trying to get him. What Sakho did was lack of discipline and respect during an ongoing season. Coutinho's actions are related to his impending transfer fiasco. He won't get away with something...

He was not shit. He was a decent option by Liverpool standards. And now its like he never even played for Liverpool. That's how much he's being frozen out. Klopp is not Rodgers. He says what he thinks and does what he wants.

But Liverpool is trying to get rid of Markovic and Ings. And they're looking to sell or loan Origi as well. Lallana is out injured for 4 months. Can is on his last year of contract and is refusing to sign a new deal and is looking to move to Juventus. Sturridge is the history of injuries, nuff...

Sakho didn't show dissent during a transfer window and nobody were urgently trying to buy him. Coutinho's situation is different. But if he's still at Liverpool after September 1, you can be sure that if he's still acting like a primadonna, he'll get the same treatment. Its actually Coutinho who...

I think you're right. That's exactly what Klopp would do. BTW, how's Sakho doing?

He can try, but I'm willing to bet that he's not going to like the outcome. Unlike Rodgers, Klopp is no pushover. He'll send Coutinho to the reserves or the U-23s. As I've said before, Liverpool are under no legal obligation to sell him to anyone this summer or even next one. Heck, they can let...

If Liverpool were to go all out on VVD and Lemar, their combined fees would be somewhere around 160m. That's incidentally the amount being thrown around for their asking price of Coutinho. Too much coincidence for me.

If Liverpool don't get Lemar, Barca don't get Coutinho.

Hey, Di Maria is not that bad. Maybe past his best but still a decent bench option.

Please do. It would actually benefit you more in the long term.

Nobody was getting Keita this season no matter the price, not even Barcelona. That's why the Liverpool deal is for next season.

Probably depends on the Lemar deal as well. If Liverpool can get VVD + Lemar now, there's not much reason for them to keep an unhappy player around when the squad would be strong enough to handle his loss. Plus Coutinho is the "moody" type, unlike Suarez who hardly ever lets off-field incidents...

No we barely even talked about Keita after the 2nd failed bid. Even the media thought the deal was off. You and Mundo Deportivo on the other hand......how'd you put it? "bitching and moaning" was it?

It was a reported 65m euros + 10m in bonuses. The reason Liverpool were able to reach an agreement for him was the "next year" agreement. RBL has told them time and time again "We don't need the money. We want to keep him. If you want him, com back next year when his clause(£48m) becomes...

138 million hours most likely.

Well we could paraphrase or translate it however we want, but its still an insane amount of money in any case. There is no way in hell Barca would pay £150m fixed with further clauses for just about anyone right now(a couple of obvious ones excluded, of course).