Search results

They are strikers, he is AM/RW. He's not better than Coutinho for AM or Costa for RW.

So, I heard he'll extend until 2021?

He'd never put all 3 of them on pitch at once. Too much offensive firepower for his taste.

Every time we tried something different he results were ... let's just say less than satisfactory.

Together with Adama, Samper and Grimaldo. And at the same time FC BARCELONA deemed Gumbau and Munir to be worthy of A-team.

It is not certain at all that Messi will play sa much as last season. He might become injuried, or simply tired. And like I said we can change our front three quite easily to accomodate Yarmolenko on RW. Let's say we need to sub Ney or Suarez. Messi moves to AM/False 9. Yarmolenko to RW and...

What I meant that he could either be a plug-in sub and stay on the original position (for example Suarez is subbed and Yarmolenko becomes new Center Forward, if Neymar he becomes LW), or the attacking shape will change by moving Yarmolenko to RW and Messi to 9, when Suarez is out. I'm not sure...

I disagree. Yarmolenko is higher reward (higher risk too) signing. He's younger than NOlito and has higher ceiling. We need to act more like Madrid and start buying younger players, not forwards like Nolito who might have just 2 years in them on top level. And Yarmolenko shouldn't cost more than...

They never paid his buyout. His buyout with taxes would have been 45m, they paid 30. We sold him to them. Also it is not far fetched to assume Yarmolenko COULD be better player than Pedro. Pedro was always very overrated here. More risky yes, because Pedro was "proven" here, but Yarmolenko has...

I'm not sure, but I don't think people praising him now are the same who said his purchase was the worst deal ever. I for example always though he'd be perfect fit for our system :).

Activating the buyout in both cases would be stupid. I'm not exactly sure how high are the taxes in Spain, but I've heard it's almost 50%. So 18+9=27 m, that's too much for Nolito, no matter how LE likes him.

Because he believes Yarmolenko is better player?

Almost all transfers today are like that. Even Real pays in installments.

It is unusual. Before this summer 50 mil was paid for world class players. And even this season only Sterling was sold for huge amount of money without being WC, other big purchases were tall for top players. Martial is just talent and it is not certain at all he'll develop into top player. IMO...

Yeah, he did not force the move at all. It was mutual decision. Pedro did more to "force the move" than Fabregas.

Masche is great, but his height can be siginficant disadvantage against some teams. He could start, but against teams that are great in the air we could use Verminator.

What are you talking about? He has been inconsistent for whole last season. There were games (and not few) when he looked WORSE than against Malaga. I disagree that he's a liability though. Not much of positive contribution, but not few really negative moments either. Anyway, like I mentioned...

Not sure at all. Draxler was a big talent 2 years ago (I even wanted him in Barcelona), but his progress stalled big time.

Wrong, Casilas was a liability for them for at least 2 years. Weakest pat of balanced squad. Also even before we never had big problems with Casilas, there were other GKs in La Liga, not so good in general but better against our strikers. I was always more afraid of Kameni or Curtois, than Casillas.

He's quite similar player to Depay though. More of a striker than winger, but I don't think he's what United need.