Search results

Iniesta SAF

If only better players equated to success. Liverpool are pretty crap for a top team on paper but watch them play and they do look like a team who can attack. And you watch us and most of the times you will fall asleep only to be woken up the commentrator going crazy for some individual messi...

No way rakitic was 3rd best in the squad ffs. Umtiti alba roberto busquets and even suarez with his dire overall gameplay could be better than raki. What has raki done again? Did the defensive work worse than he did previous seasons and provided absolutely 0 contribution in attack and he is not...

Should have been a top top priority when they won back to back not just now. In any other situation I would be ok with our current strategy but with RM winning 4 cl in 5 years, sorry but we have to go for the CL all out and not give two shits about the copa.

Don't take Jamdav seriously, no one takes Jamdav seriously.

Psych. I was kidding. This has happened more times than you have said "You contradicted yourself"

Did you see the context in which I defined it in? I was asked how RM choking can be called luck, which I hadn't said it was luck in the first place, and I replied that luck is something that is out of our control so that COULD mean RM choking as luck. So yes, always a loose term.

For starters how about we were ten times the team tactically that we are now and the chelsea case was a one off? And real isn't even a good example. We were amazing in the second half that match. How was it luck? We were lucky on some isolated incidents and used to be a much better team than...

You are totally right.

Always was.

This wasn't common? Oh god.

Yup. And I said this quite some pages back with jamdav as a witness.

Luck is a loose term, moron. Go back to threads where messi bailed us out. Everyone will be saying we are lucky messi scored this and Mats saved that.

Not about luck at all. I am talking about how misleading the double is. Creating nothing all game only to be bailed out by Messi or mats means something is not right with the team.

Everything adds up once you get rid of your luck fetish.

Indeed it is becoming pointless. This if and if nots wasn't the point. The point was not to be mislead by the double and that we are not that good that one may think of when he considers double winners. Thank you jamdav for being so needlessly pedantic

No If i was stretching I would have included RM and atleti being bad as luck, not as an open ended question. What do you mean how barca were lucky? How is anyone ever lucky?

We had 8 draws of which I think one or two were bad luck one being the ref mistake off the top of my head. But there are so many games we didn't lose and you can only wonder why thanks to mats or messi or opponents forgetting to finish.

I don't know if you know this, but luck consists of factors that aren't in your hand or control. If I am facing the winner of germany and iceland and germany somehow chokes and I face iceland wouldn't I be lucky? Also I never said RM and atleti being bad was lucky. Read again and you will know...

It settles it.