Search results

In Tito's words, it was his choice. I really don't know what they were thinking at the time, knowing that Xavi isn't getting any younger and Cesc was never going to be a good CM for us. I have more faith in Rafinha than in that replacement.

I see Pique didn't oppened the door for Cesc, like he did with Tello and Montoya, though his friend has complained much more than those 2.

:tata1:

What does it mean "good enough for us to win a CL"? Something like Oleguer, who managed to win the CL with us, unlike let's say Rivaldo or Ibrahimovic? It's clear for you, for some of us it isn't.

So you guys think that Mourinho would take Costa, Filipe Luis and Koke from Atletico in only one summer? I don't see it.

"I would have nothing against signing Mascherano, but if the whole deal were to cost us 40 million euros over three years, then I'd have to say no," De Laurentiis said at a book presentation in Rome on Tuesday. "But we'll just have to see -- if Mascherano realises that he's not playing...

And you are not taking into account the fact that we have a sporting director that was incapable of buying a CB in 4 years..do you really trust him to buy the midfielder Lucho wants after he sells Cesc, knowing that most teams will try to rip us off? Also Ozil was sold after RM bought Bale&Isco...

Except I wasn't talking about Pep, I was talking about Rosell and about his words from day one.

The history tells us that Rosell is the only club president that promissed to make Pep our Fergusson and the only club president with whom Pep signed only 1 year contracts. From there everybody is free to draw their own conclusion. Not could, this really is the first board to get the club...

Completelly agree..though it's too bad that Tata couldn't doo the same with Rosell, wouldn't you say so? Then maybe he wouldn't be the first Barca president to get the the club indicted in 115 years.

http://www.mundodeportivo.com/20131209/fc-barcelona/rosell-califica-de-temeraria-la-demanda-por-distraer-40-millones-en-el-fichaje-neymar_54395985656.html#ixzz33a25TGlY :VdB:

Rosell and a representative of Barca because the club has also been indicted. You know what another cule said to me when I told him that the club will have to pay a fine between 9 and 54M euros because of what Rosell did? "Yeah, but don't forget that Laporta paid 70M for Ibrahimovic and RM...

I forgot about Navas..is he still injured? Because they would have needed him against team like Portugal. I would have certainly taken him before someone like Mata who brings nothing new and who will probably play as much as he did at the last EC. Do you think that Deulofeu deserves to be on...

After they had Arbeloa there, I don't know how you can say this about Azpi. Especially when they have Alba on the other side so Azpilicueta will have to be more defensive. I agree about Torres(I would have taken Llorente), but the one who should have stayed home from the midfield is Mata..and...

They atacked Valdes for years because he was not Casillas, so it's seems only natural for them to do the same with our new GK. They are not harming the current president though and that's all that matters to him.

Not as good as Iniesta, Silva or Busi though. :coffee:

The Don :wub:

Deulo for Pedro

Torres :lol:

If it were up to me, I wouldn't take either of them to the World Cup.