SeloBarca
Senior Member
It doesn't work that way. For example, if a team has to defend 20 attacks in one game, and receives 2 goals, that is a good defensive performance. But if a team has to defend only 4 attacks, and also receives 2 goals, that is not a good defensive performance by any means. In the first case, 90% of the opponent's chances to score were solved by the defence (including the keeper), while in the second scenario only 50% of the opponent's chances were handled right. So, in conclusion, both teams received the same number of goals, but their efficiency rate is very different. That proves conceded goals is not always the best way to measure the quality of a defence.
Well said, less conceded goals =/= better defence. Our defence last year was appaling even though we conceded less then RM.