Mitchell1978
Senior Member
Hamstring problems can be a bitch, Diego Costa is still stuggling with it dating back to the end of last season.
I find it disturbing when football fans dismiss the finances associated with a poor transfer as insignificant and inconsequential. A dollar wasted is a dollar which could 've instead gone in to youth development, overseas schools or any social/philanthropic project.
Blowing away 10 m€ or whatever "nothing" amount (and thats not including the player wages) over a transaction that most likely has zero returns is lamentable.
No, they would have just paid back an additional 10m of our debt.
We needed another defender and we got one... If the club thought that buying Vermaelen would have "zero returns" then they wouldn't have bought him. It's way too early to claim that he will fail here.
Like the board always make such wise football decisions. Keirrison, Henrique, to name a few.
The discomfort comes and goes? I know he won't be expensive unless he gets to play, but the way this is going, he might not even play 5 games all season.
which is never a bad thing.
Like the board always make such wise football decisions. Keirrison, Henrique, to name a few.
I find it disturbing when football fans dismiss the finances associated with a poor transfer as insignificant and inconsequential. A dollar wasted is a dollar which could 've instead gone in to youth development, overseas schools or any social/philanthropic project. Blowing away 10 m€ or whatever "nothing" amount (and thats not including the player wages) over a transaction that most likely has zero returns is lamentable. Its understandable to risk on potential and youth, not on a player nearing 30, who's not even the best in his position, hoping that he'll of be utility IF he recovers from his persistent injury issues. But he's a "handsome devil" and "verminator", enough to justify his signature for most folks.
.
Like the board always make such wise football decisions. Keirrison, Henrique, to name a few.