soul24rage
Senior Member
ughhh
I would like to see either puig or gavi in midfield, but we'll probably see Bob for Pedri there
I would like to see either puig or gavi in midfield, but we'll probably see Bob for Pedri there
Fast, direct football is not part of Barca's identity and never will be.
That is a lie that we spoke into reality.
Barca identity was entertaining and attacking football, not possession one.
Rijkaard, LVG, Lucho has all adopted different Barca styles successfully (and during their times, popular too)
That is a lie that we spoke into reality.
Barca identity was entertaining and attacking football, not possession one.
Rijkaard, LVG, Lucho has all adopted different Barca styles successfully (and during their times, popular too)
Lucho, LVG & Rijkaard teams always dominated possession, not quite to the extent of Pep but still. 2006 CL final Barca enjoyed 64% against possession based Arsenal. 2015 final versus Juve, 61%. Pace is good and we've had it with Henry, Eto'o, Pedro etc but Barca DNA, particularly last 15 years or so, is named possession.
Arsenal played with 10men since minute 20 or something like that.
Lucho's Barca tried to play counters whenever possible.
On the other hand, new gen of players raised on Pep's Barca, like Arthur (and Pedri isn't too far either) just play possession and never shoot.
About possession, if you ask Pep or Xavi, they'll say that 80% of possession is good.
On the other hand, if you ask Bayern, they often say: we had 70% of possession, that was too much, we need to play faster, risk more and shoot earlier.
Deep down, that is the point.
Some possession teams like Rijkaard's Barca, Lucho's Barca and Bayern = will play a possession game but also they will hit the counter or a shot whenever possible.
Pep and Xavi will play a different possession game, with less risks, less solo actions and shots = where you will always look for a teammate in a better position and shoot only from perfect positions.
I personally don't hate possession.
I hate Pep's type of too much possession and consequences on people, fans and young players where players started to play, learn and breathe Pep's too sterile midfield game from the early age.
And then you get Arthur, Frenkie and Pedri who combined have 15 shots on goal over 50 matches.
So, yes, possession game is our DNA.
But not every possession game is the same.
Pep has proven till now that his type of a possession game can't win a CL without prime Messi and Xavi, no matter how much he spends.
Bayern at least won several CLs and played lots of finals without Messi and Xavi.
Unlike Pep.
Lucho, LVG & Rijkaard teams always dominated possession, not quite to the extent of Pep but still. 2006 CL final Barca enjoyed 64% against possession based Arsenal. 2015 final versus Juve, 61%. Pace is good and we've had it with Henry, Eto'o, Pedro etc but Barca DNA, particularly last 15 years or so, is named possession.
2006 Arsenal had a red card early on, we played very conservative games against both Chelsea and Milan.
2015 we lost possession against Bayern in both games with no problem.
Attacking football usually means you have more possession, but that is one big difference between possession based game that fans talk about and direct style.
Also, possession can be obtained by different measures, high press, get the ball back fast will mean more possession.
Pass aimlessly for long time, and you also get possession, we had the ball more when we lost 8-2 against Bayern
We had 49% possession when we lost 8-2