JamDav1982
Senior Member
You'd be surprised.
I wouldnt. No one is paying that for him at that age.
You'd be surprised.
You'd be surprised. We paid 40 for a soon to be 30 Paulinho from China. And Sanchez is a star compared with Paulinho, rated a lot higher.
No one would be paying 100m for a soon to be 30 Sanchez.
Nah, Sanchez has matured (in decision making) a lot since his Barca days. Will be a success for City easily. The problem is I don't see where he fits into the squad, Sterling and Sane are too good to be benched. Sane is the inferior one I guess, but him going to bench will slow down his development considerably. Although of course it is a nice problem to have.
bringing sane on with fresh legs to kill teams off who get tired is going to be a nightmare to deal with his pace. Sterling is a lock to start pretty much. Sane would be the guy off the bench
Nah, Sanchez has matured (in decision making) a lot since his Barca days. Will be a success for City easily. The problem is I don't see where he fits into the squad, Sterling and Sane are too good to be benched. Sane is the inferior one I guess, but him going to bench will slow down his development considerably. Although of course it is a nice problem to have.
I actually think Sane is better than Sterling..
I think City aren't coughing up as much as Arsenal want so they have thrown Uniteds hat into the ring to bump the price up..