Leo_Messi
New member
I totally agree with this. A tall, strong striker who can head the ball is a great plan B for a team like ours. If we are going to have a Chelsea striker on loan, I would like it to be Giroud (his contract ends on summer 2019).
As for Morata, I wouldn't mind him if he is the only striker that is available for loan for the rest of the season. We only have Suarez as a striker and we really need another one. The Dembele experiment didn't work out well today.
I did not know about Giroud's contract situation and I have not heard of any rumors about him wanting out. In any case he could be a very useful short-term option indeed for the reminder of the season. Not sure if he would be ready to move to a new country, club etc. and not knowing if he would move there for only 5 months or longer. That's the main problem with loaning players for 5 months only.
Yes, I have called for such an "luxury" striker for years. In fact pre-Ibra as well.
Just think about how many times the aerial presence of the likes of Ronaldo, Bale, Benzema and Ramos (although he is not an attacker) has bailed out RM when nothing else worked. It has helped them win several CL titles etc. We don't really have that option when nothing works. Flooding the penalty area with crosses almost always creates goal-scoring opportunities.
Just take a look at Alba and his crosses. He almost never makes high crosses. Almost always "flat" crosses. Having both options would be a good thing and add more unpredictability into our attacking play.
Last edited: