How was Laporta lucky when appointing Pep? I love how people brings this up as some sort of argument but I really don't understand the logic. Was he lucky because he hired an unproven manager? How is that lucky? It's not like there was a manager draft and he had to go with a random manager they pulled out of a hat. It was his decision.
And "the new board" doesn't exist. There is no "new board". It is the same board. Rosell was arrogant and corrupt? Well guess what. The entire current board knew what was going on and did nothing about it. The La Masia fiasco, the Neymar transfer, etc...
Everythime you hire manager, there's a risk that it might not work. You may bring back Guardiola, buy the players he wants and not be successful as he was during his first gig. We are talking about sport, which is not an exact science and hiring manager is always a gamble.
When Bartomey says "profound changes" he means promoting Bagnak to first team and bringing back Bojan.
For amateurs disguised in professionals any transfer is a gamble, because they lack the knowledge and the flair to make their decisions anything less than arbitrary. Guardiola has the right temper and the right attitude to be the manager of a great team. He wasn't a gamble, he was a great coach waiting for someone to realise that. Laporta did, so don't try to discredit that. Even if hiring an unaccomplished manager is a gamble, as you say, there are good gambles and bad gambles. If you don't have the guts or the skill, don't do gambles.
Bartomeu is lucky if he hits the floor when he falls. Never mind finding us another Pep.
Luis Enrique is the sensible option in my opinion. Why? He can deal with the big egos, and ship out those who won't do the manager's bidding.
This means that Bojan is coming home arty1:
I completely forgot he existed.
Anyone has news of Kerrison?