koko
New member
No he is better than Henry.. there isn't any player who tortured the big 3 teams constantly as much as Zola.. u look at the stuff he pulled vs your ,United & Liverpool defenders is out of this world...
i dunno about liverpool or united but he never finished on the winning team against us in a league or fa cup game i do remember them beating our reserves in the league cup though....if thats torture then its fine by me
You put Henry in an average team and he won't be able to lead.. u put Zola in an average team and they improve dramatically .. Henry scores , Zola make things happen .
yeah right 25 assists in 02/03 with 30 something goals on top isnt making things happen...in arsenal career 318 goals/assists in 369 games thats making things happen if i ever saw it not only a great goal scorer but a scorer of great goals too and a provider about the only thing he couldnt do was head the ball
Henry didn't even win a European title with such a strong team like Arsenal even though he was hyped till there was no tomorrow .. Zola managed that
league>cup winners cup and zola never managed that did he
As i said only those who were small children in the 90's would say Henry is better cause they frankly haven't watched enough of Zola
Hell u don't see Britain giving Henry an OBE . Zola received one .
im 28 i remember zola playing very well i watched his whole chelsea career...i didnt know awards from the queen were the standard for judging footballers
As a player Zola is 10 times the man and the player Henry is.. it's him and Cantona in the last 20 years..
these were both great players but both henry and bergkamp were better than both of them imo maybe im biased but thats what i believe