actually you're the one who's wrong. best transfer is what improves the team the most. martin caceres improved Sevilla extremely. as did adil rami/victor ruiz with Valencia.
did Cristiano improve Real as much? hell nah. => he can't be the best transfer.
I though you appreciated smart predictions ??
In terms of smartness of the deal, it was huge.
cesc
aguero
canales
ashley young
no particular order
no but they cannot be in the top top places. they are great transfers, yet not in the top5 best.all the players you are mentioning are without a doubt great transefers. but you can not deny players like aguero and cesc a place in the best transfers just because more money was spent in them.
you have no idea what a good transfer is do you?interms of deals they won't. but in transfers they are. i mean aguero is only behind rooney in top scorers list.
you have no idea what a good transfer is do you?
a good transfer is a combination of how you perform and how much the club had to pay for you. i wont answer you anymore, you just repeat yourself like a broken cd-player.
You should first learn how to read before coming in to a forum, when the hell did I say Cesc etc were bad signings?thats what im saying it's a combination of both. so you can't just go this player costs less buy him. you need to take in to consideration what the player does, how good they are and also what they can earn you (advertising). you can't just discard cesc , aguero and etc as bad transfers just becasue they cost alot of money. clubs are not stupid they won't spend 20+ million on a player if they weren't sure the player can improve the team.
I reiterate Jose Enrique for £6m fantastic bit of business for the best left back in the premier league!
Shame you weren't as shrewd with the other £100 million you spent. Kinda cancels this one out.