The Galacticos were pretty offensive but not very well coached iirc. It was a free-flowing Harry Redknapp esque system from what I remember. More about vibes than intricate offensive play or any form of micro-management. In a very "lads go out there and express yourselves" manner, they weren't tactically sophisticated.
My point is that yesterday's style of play was unbelievably dogshite and Mourinho's low block counter attacking system at Real was far more fun to watch than yesterday's pile of crap. Yesterday they genuinely played more defensive than Big Sam's Bolton(underrated team btw).
In my personal opinion, Klopp and Wenger's style of play is far more entertaining than the typical Barca or Pep's style. The style Spain NT used in the 2010 WC was horrendous to watch. So boring when they were using ball possession as a defensive mechanism. Gimme Klopp's fast, vertical, counterpressing system anyday.
The 3 managers with the most entertaining and fun style of play:
Klopp(Dortmund, Liverpool)
Wenger(Arsenal)
Bielsa(Leeds).
PS: The streets will never forget Peak Sarriball at Napoli.
Most styles of football has their ups and downs, but i definitely prefer the more end to end football of some of these other coaches, compared to Guardiola's style.
Its a very effective way of winning games, week in week out, i just find it robotic and sort of scripted.
City can definitely play entertaining football at times though, when the near-perfectly crafted game-plan doesn't work, and they have to let loose and go with the flow, the knock-out rounds vs them two years ago was highly entertaining, particulary the first match.
Spain 2010 was definitely the worst one to watch though, though some of that has to do with line-up, was it really neccessary to play two CDMs? Iniesta's magic was about the only thing enjoyable about it, imo.
