Can somebody explain to me how a LEGAL COURT can declare you innocent but a nothing organisation like a football association can declare you guilty? It doesn't make sense.
I'm going let you into a secret a large majority of people don't know, so make sure to keep it hush hush. It's not the courts purpose to prove someone innocent, they only serve to prove that someone is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. It's like saying that the court OJ Simpson was found innocent in proved that he was in fact innocent, nope, we all know that he did it, but it couldn't be proved beyond reasonable doubt. Similar to John Terry, due to Ashley Cole's meddling he managed to ensure that there was a case of reasonable doubt introduced into the charge, even though John Terry's defence was the worst I have ever heard. "I was only repeating back what he called me!"
The FA doesn't use reasonable doubt though, it goes with balance of probability, and on the balance of probability John Terry is guilty. Even the judge during the court case said that on balance of probability John Terry was most likely guilty, but in court its beyond reasonable doubt, so he couldn't convict him.