There is no real prove that the document is indeed authentic. There are some credible indices though. First of all these documents are part of the same hacked leaks that are going on since months already, half of them did indeed actually lead to domething and were proven to be indeed real, like Ronaldos tax fraud, the racist PSG scout, Citys deal with that danish club and their African academy or the fact that Ronaldo had a settlement with an alleged **** victim in the first place. This is the same dude that provided Spiegel and co. with multiple terrabites of hacked data and everyone is approving his credibility by now, yet suddenly this one document that condemns Ronaldo is fake?
Another thing are Ronaldos lawyers, they have jumped around and contradicted themselves multiple times over the past few months. First they claimed the documents were fabricated, then they said the documents are private, and now they say the documents might be real but altered. If they really were, then why the fuck isn‘t Ronaldo actually suing them? If Football Leaks or Spiegel were caught forging documents then Ronaldo could ruin them in an instant. Yet he doesn‘t sue, I wonder why?
Of course, when they go to court this questionnaire isn‘t admissable, because law states that every piece of evidence brought forward to court needs to be legally obtained (not hacked or stolen) in order to prove their authencity. That‘s probably why Ronaldo can‘t be proven guilty in the end because the biggest piece of evidence in this entire case was a leak. Bad luck Mayorga.
