He could have played in Barca. Now fight for 4th place in EPL. Decisions...
Dont think so. Hes not starter quality.
He could have played in Barca. Now fight for 4th place in EPL. Decisions...
Odegaard next (if that's not a L already) ;-)
Odegaard next (if that's not a L already) ;-)
Edit: Valverde is not safe either. Camavinga is a better talent (for me).
Odegaard next (if that's not a L already) ;-)
Edit: Valverde is not safe either. Camavinga is a better talent (for me).
What's Valverde got to do with Edu? They play on opposite sides of the field.
When you think 3 steps ahead Valverde-DM-Camavinga doesn't look very balanced (unless one of them adapts to DM). And for now there can only be one, Highlander style, playing with Casemiro, Kroos and Modric. I wouldn't be surprised if Camavinga is a first 11 player at the end of the season (direct Modric replacement) and Valverde remains squad player #12-15.
Quite frankly, I don't think Valverde is a great talent. He has a few very nice qualities (pace, directness, workrate), but I would be surprised if that's enough for Real Madrid.
Camavinga is a box to box destroyer with the technical ability of an attacking midfielder. Valverde imo is a like to like replacement of Modric. It looks quite balanced and imo strong when you add Casemiro in.
Comparing Valverde with Ceballos is dumb.
Not doing that :S Just talking about who I think will succeed as a first 11 midfielder for Real. Valverde, like Ceballos, ain't it.
Valverde has already succeded to a large extent, so again, your comparison is dumb.
.Not doing that :S Just talking about who I think will succeed as a first 11 midfielder for Real. Valverde, like Ceballos, ain't it.