Not to go too far off topic, but another one that stings is the 2010 CL loss to Inter. I was so hyped up about the possibility of winning the CL final at the Bernabeu that year. Very unfortunate that Iniesta was injured and the stupid volcano eruption forcing the team to bus to the San Siro.
While Barca did get a couple of fortunate breaks as well, I still feel as if the 2009-12 teams should have gone 4/4 or atleast 3/4 in CLs.
4/4. We were the best team in the world on all fronts from 2009-2012. La Liga points tallies consistently in the 90s in the same period (peaking at 99 ahead of RM who finished at 96 in 2010 !!), and winning Copas, UEFA super cups, Spanish super cups and CWCs to boot.
Imperious performances. 6-2 Madrid, 5-0 Madrid, 4-0 Bayern, 3-1 United, 2-0 United (08-09 version was one of the strongest sides of the modern era), 4-1 Arsenal (with RVP and Cesc).
All this while playing a REVOLUTIONARY style. Basically attacking, proactive football from another dimension. Even the watered down version of it without Messi won 2 euros and a WC back to back to back.
Buffoons like BBZ who try to simplify it to "lol but only 2 CL in 4 years and lol only 3 Ligas in 4 years" miss the essence of football.
For comparison, the great RM side of 14-18 did win 4 out of 5 CL but won the league only 1 time in 5 years. Never had a dominant performance v Barca. In fact, we beat them 4-0, 4-3 (Bernabeu), 3-2 (Bernabeu), 3-0 (Bernabeu) and a few 2-1s in the same period. They just happened to be good at KO football and had severe luck v Liverpool (Karius lol and no Salah) and Bayern (lol Bernat and lol red cards).
But some clowns would rather us play physical, workhorse driven muscle ball like perennial CL losers Juve, Atletico, and Chelsea. I don't mind workhorses like in 05/06. They have their merits and contribute to CL wins. But to be tolerable, you still need a R10, Messi, Eto'o up front. Not sterile Valverde haramball with a zombie like Rakitic.