The reasoning seems solid but then they are calculating salaries that are totally obscenely valued vs the actual player. They put Alves at like 5m or something when he was no better than Liga mid table quality.
Plus, taking the salary from the past club (PSG) who have much less lax FP rules in their league and much more money to offer isn't fair. It should at least be contextualised for Spain where salaries are always a lot lower than some other big leagues...
Yeah, I do not think they should even interpret salaries for incoming players to LaLiga. It is a slippery slope. Especially with Alves as the 5m wage is short term contract and can not be amortized by the club. Does that mean those 5m for 6 months of Alves are still counting against our 3 year salary cap calculations for example?
But even if they were to calculate previous wage, Alves was on just under 3.5m gross at Sao Paulo so how does it become 5m for us?
Clearly though, we were gaming the system. But gaming the system doesn't mean breaking the rules. It should just mean amending the rules in years going forward to stop similar loopholes, not making rule change and applications on the fly.
If you search on Capology the LaLiga gross wages of 37 year olds you have Raul Albiol on just under 5m, Navas on 4m and David Silva on 2.9m. So maybe through the LaLiga market rates Alves should have been placed around the 2-4m range considering average LaLiga rates of similar ages.
Can clearly see Tebas has an agenda based on those two data points, Alves previous wage and LaLiga average wage of similar players.