JamDav1982
Senior Member
Coutinho is the bigger flop. We spent more money on him than real Madird did on hazard too.
Wont be much in it in the end.
Coutinho is the bigger flop. We spent more money on him than real Madird did on hazard too.
Coutinho is the bigger flop. We spent more money on him than real Madird did on hazard too.
Coutinho is the bigger flop. We spent more money on him than real Madird did on hazard too.
Not by much, Hazard cost them 100M (and some add-ons) while Coutinho came with 120 (and some major add-ons) and Bayern paid 20M for his loan.
Coutinho is also the younger player, so he might end up being sold for few millions, Hazard is already over 30, doubt RM will be able to get anything for him.
According to Transfermarkt we are paying Liverpool €135m (some of which still haven’t been paid yet by us, of course) and Bayern’s loan fee was only €8.5m.
mThere wont be any more paid to Liverpool.. not that they are getting anything anyway as sold on the transfer fee.
160m was the max, 10m from not winning CL cant be met, 10m+ 'paid' by Coutinho, 8.5m paid by Bayern and around 5m left in appearance clause.
Will cost around 125m in end.
There wont be any more paid to Liverpool.. not that they are getting anything anyway as sold on the transfer fee.
160m was the max, 10m from not winning CL cant be met, 10m+ 'paid' by Coutinho, 8.5m paid by Bayern and around 5m left in appearance clause.
Will cost around 125m in end.
Now looking back.. How the hell we valued Coutinho 120 million? He was good sure.. but not world class.
Coutinho is the bigger flop. We spent more money on him than real Madird did on hazard too.
TBF a claim that Hazard is somewhere between Boateng and Malcom made by someone whose posts are somewhere between serghei and messigician isn't worth very much
TBF a claim that Hazard is somewhere between Boateng and Malcom made by someone whose posts are somewhere between serghei and messigician isn't worth very much