That was the biggest joke I have heard from a long time. In any body on body contact with opponents Camavinga is the one who ends up laying on the grass and you call him a destroyer? Mu ha ha ha !!!
First action of the game against PSG. Camavinga in a duel with a strong striker like Cavani. Guess who ends up on the ground?
Ok, you don't like him. That's ok. But you don't need to discredit his talent by saying things that are far from truth.
Does he ends up on the ground when he gets fouled? Of course he does like 99% of the players. But he's already pretty strong and his body is still not fully developed so he can add more muscles over the next few years.
Is he still raw at some aspects of the game like losing possession a bit to often? Yes, which is totally understandable at his age. He still needs to learn a lot but he has all the required attributes to become a world class player. At least technically and physically, I won't pretend I know enough about his mental makeup that usually decide whether a player will turn out average, good or great. When you have two players with a similar talent level and one of them is hardworking and driven to success while the other is lazy and thinks just his talent will be enough to make a great career (because he has dominated his competition in younger selections) then it's an easy answer who of them has much bigger chances to succeed.
Yes, clubs have all kind of informations about the players they're interested in nowadays but correctly evaluating player's personality/mentality is usually the toughest for them. Scouts can easily see if a player is stronger, faster, technically superior,... than other players his age. And they can more or less project if this will translate into the next level (once they'll have to play against more experienced, better, stronger, faster,... players) - or they can also see it in games if a player is already playing a senior football at age 16/17 like Camavinga or Fati - and if he fits their club based on what they're looking for.
But clubs usually don't know a player well enough until they buy him and see him on trainings every day when some of his negative traits (that every player has) will become more obvious. Surely scouts can watch a player in games and what he shows there is usually a good indicator of his quality/talent. But what if he'll never reach his full potential because he's not fully commited to become the best player he can? Nowadays there are rumours about some players partying/being lazy in trainings or other off the field problems (and all those should be a pretty big red flag for every interested club) but how true are those rumours?
And what about the other 99% of the players we hear nothing about? Are some of them also not giving their all in trainings, are they "normal" professionals who do what's asked of them (which is usually good enough) or do they do some extra individual work after trainings? Now I know not every training warrior/workaholic will turn out to be the next Cristiano but knowing that a player has those positive personal traits can help the club to decide if they have to choose between this player who is maybe a bit less talented and another one who is more talented but has some red flags mentioned above. The first player is much more likely to have a good career but that's obviously not always the case.
Another thing that clubs don't know is how a young player will adapt to living in a different country without his close friends (and sometimes even familly members) to support him. Few players will adapt fast, more players will need a year or two and some will never adapt regardless of how much support they'll get. If they will have problems to adapt off the field then they'll usually struggle on the field as well. And since most fans usually only judge players based on what they see of them during the games and they can easily be disappointed if their (high) expectations aren't met then they'll criticise the player which can only cause him more harm (I don't think most players read fan forums etc. - if they are smart anyway
- but they can feel if the fans are not satisfied with their performances). So club's role here is very important. Will they still believe enough in a player to support him going through rough times (and potentially benefit big in future) or will they give up on a player which they can later be sorry about if he'll develop into what they've expected him to be in another club?
Sadly nowadays players only get two seasons at most to show what they have. For older, proven players this should be enough time but that's not always the case when talking about 17-19 yo kids. Not everyone can be Messi at that time. And even Messi was often used as a backup/in rotation with Giuly early in his career.
So all those things considered buying Camavinga for 60-70m is certainly not without a risk especially in tough times (from economical standpoint) in front of the club. But I still believe his upside is so high that I'd rather take him than spending 100m on another forward who will be misused again like Griezmann.
We need to add more athleticism in our lineup and Camavinga+Upamecano would be a great start. They could help us right away but even more in future once amigos will finally be gone and younger players (lead by "vetarans" like MATS and FDJ) can take over. But sadly I don't believe we'll get either of them.