Yannik
Senior Member
The guys I mentioned has won so many balon/Fifa awards that is voted by the best 0.1 of the rest of the 1% you mentioned. Unless you really think those voters don't have same knowledge you have on football.
Sure, some of them had short career primes, but 99% of the 1% (coaches and journalists) would take that short prime over players who dominated longer but was less dominant.
You know why? Because as you said football is complex, and players with such talents have the most ability to solve it.
Most of the players you mentioned were granted free roles. They were allowed to concentrate on what they do best, while 1 or even 2 teammates had to be limited to the dirty work to cover for that. That's not always translating to a better team.
If you look at recent CL winners like Liverpool, Madrid or Bayern, then these teams weren't overloaded with flair or individualists. Even Ronaldo as you said "matured" his playstyle to replace aesthetics with functionality and only then he actually started to compete with Messi. Sure these teams still had fantastic technical capabilities, but generally they played no-bullshit football and very visibly dominated through that.
Hell if you also look at the country with the most NT titles its Brazil, which is quite clearly very flairful.
And then? Germany. Or Italy. Which proves that rainbow flicks and sombreros are not the only way to solve the complexity of football. For every Zidane, there was a Matthaeus. You don't want Ballon D'Ors, you want titles. And a dude with the potential to score 40+ goals each season for 10 years straight will eventually get there.
Last edited: