Moe
powered by;
Talking about Falcao then he's 1.77m and an absolute threat in the air and was one of the best strikers in the World before his injury. A very complete #9.
He was perhaps the most important and the least talked player about when it comes to Atletico's redemption and rise from Patetico to a legit team. Without that Europa League and Copa del Rey win over Real Madrid I'm not sure they'd have a platform to build onto.
I agree with you on this one. Falcaos contribution to Atleticos rise is criminally underrated.
I see some Falcao in Lautaro Martinez.
Doesn't mean the cost of his transfer is in any way justifiable, but the hope is that he can be a player like that/Aguero.
I also see some Falcao in Lautaro. But not as strong, not as fast, a bit shorter, and more overrated than 23 year old Falcao.
23 year old Aguero was a different beast. Much much more proven than your usual 23 year old player.
I do understand that players don't necessarily have to take the same trajectory and that Lautaro might somehow end up better than both Falcao and Aguero. Yet my question remains, why take the risk? He is so overpriced and regardless of the Catalan propaganda no team other than Barca are willing to pay that much for him. Just as no team was willing to pay 120m for Dembele and 140m for Coutinho.
Back in 2013 when we took the risk and paid a lot for a young Neymar, I was really glad we did it because he was genuinely a rare talent than doesn't come often. In addition it was clear to see how marketable he was, and that he will have a good resale value. Just as nowadays Mbappe and Haland are rare talents that no matter how much they cost you wont overpay for them and as long as they avoid injuries they will have a good resale value if things don't work out.