1-You keep quoting a total bs article as a good read and repeat that 5-6 resources, which is again a bs.
Regardless, this wasn't what I asked. I am asking how what Pique said is relevant in any way to the point you are making
2-As I said,pkayers are asked about manager situation all the time in big properly managed clubs.Unless you live under a rock nothing is hilarious in it.
Pirlo was hired because Juve veterans advocated for him is a one example of this.
And the players here didn't force anything, it is a usual consultation and they told board you make the decision
I would like to hear who are the 'properly managed clubs' that ask their players to decide on the manager.
Citing Pirlo as an example supporting your case is hilarious.
Why on earth would you think that this was the right move for Juve? They might end up losing the league for the first time in 10 years.
What players think is conditioned by their limited perspective on who is and who is not a good coach. Making them co-decision makers is granting them power beyond their territory and position.
On the contrary, properly managed clubs, like Liverpool, have their relevant departments and sporting director spend around 3 months of compiling a detailed file on Klopp, with what he does right and what he does not before approaching him, without asking any player about it, and without asking any player whether Rodgers is fine for them or not.
PS: Pique is winning because the board did not listen to the veterans about Valverde, which was their favorite coach, as he was letting them NOT train.
The problem with Messi and Pique and co, is that they think they know what the team needs (which of course involves their declined presence), while in fact they know SHIT.
The sole fact that they suppported Valverde after Anfield says it all.
Don't conflate their limited and self-centered perspective with the fact that the board is incompetent