serghei
Senior Member
The problem wasn't removing EV. It's was removing EV and hiring Setien and Koeman, two managers who have only had partially successful managerial careers at lower mid-table clubs.
Barcelona should have sacked EV after Ainfield and bought in someone like Poch or Rodgers who have a proven record of success at the top level on a 2 year contract and let them build the team until the new board was elected.
Instead we got stuck with EV + Setien + Koeman after Liverpool and it's turned out to be disastrous.
It's nice that Koeman is giving young players a chance and allowing the likes of Ansu, Pedri, Aruajo, Dest to become starters here, but he's just so tactically inept that it defeats the purpose.
Setien was only appointed because they had nobody to step in, who would be desperate enough to coach Barca and step in the middle of that shit. He was probably one of the few options left after other names declined to take over midseason.
EV should've been sacked after Copa final. And a better manager should've been brought, as you say.
EV was a good option to get a few last trophies out of the aging stars before they get completely done at a high level. He was never an option to rebuild the side, because he simply doesn't have the skills to do such a difficult job. Neither does Koeman.
Also, as long as EV's path was clear: getting some last years from an aging core of players, money shouldn't have been spent to refresh the side. And we spent a lot of money under Valverde. Hundreds of millions. And now when we do need the money since the rebuild is inevitable, we don't have it.
The whole plan was unclear, muddled, wishy-washy. With conflicting decisions. If you wanna go with the aging core and get some last trophies, fine, but don't go about and sign a lot of young 22 years old players, as if you're really trying to rebuild the side.
Last edited: