Ernesto Valverde - V1

serghei

Senior Member
Two things from those passmaps. Rayo obviously targeted our right side. Look at their setup. Secondly, Suarez had 0 support from his teammates.


And yet he was immense. Scored his only two chances and had a great bit of skill that was inches away from an absolute golazo.
 

KingLeo10

Senior Member
3 man backline in the midfield...

even a B team coach knows how to set up a better midfield than this.

why are we paying this clown 7 million a season?
 

xXKonan

Senior Member
Once again proof that Valverde has no system. Everything we do going forward we do because we have players who can at times individually create things with their ability. When those players are either tired, injured, or just don't give enough effort, we are basically in ruins, because there's nothing, no plan, no patterns of play, no nothing.
His system reminds me of a poor mans version of the treble winning season in 2014-15.

He's basically only using the Midfield to control the game and retain possession while relying on the Forwards and Fullbacks to create. But vs Rayo Suarez was basically alone in a 4-5-1 until Dembele was subbed on in the front line.
 

serghei

Senior Member
His system reminds me of a poor mans version of the treble winning season in 2014-15.

He's basically only using the Midfield to control the game and retain possession while relying on the Forwards and Fullbacks to create. But vs Rayo Suarez was basically alone in a 4-5-1 until Dembele was subbed on in the front line.

That treble winning team was great as long as MSN were firing on all cillinders, dribbling players for fun and scoring golazo after golazo. That was about 12-14 months. From january 2015 until february 2016 or so. Then it completely went to shit as MSN were, obviously, unable to perform at that crazy level for long.

But, you're right, tactically there's not much difference.
 
Last edited:

xXKonan

Senior Member
Midfield won't change much anytime soon.

Arthur is still a developing player himself and he's not quite creative yet but he brings other good things to the table at this time. I expected Rakitic to step up more being the more attacking option in the Midfield but while he has his limitations I do think he maybe asked to be more conservative as well.

I think Coutinho is being asked to do most of the creative work but as you can see it hasn't been happening.
 

khaled_a_d

Senior Member
That treble winning team was great as long as MSN were firing on all cillinders, dribbling players for fun and scoring golazo after golazo. That was about 12-14 months. From january 2015 until february 2016 or so. Then it completely went to shit as MSN were, obviously, unable to perform at that crazy level for long.

But, you're right, tactically there's not much difference.

People are criminally underrating our midfield in Lucho 1st 2 years,Raki and Iniesta were critical and not just providing control, CL 1st goal is huge example of how much this midfield played a part, Iniesta assist against PSG too etc.
The brilliance of MSN made that midfield creativity go under the radar tbh, later on Iniesta lost a step, Raki struggled with both fatigue and with basically new role at right side when Messi moved to the inside again.
 

Cule4life

The Culest
Khaled aka "Mr. Revisionism" at it again. After terming Roma the 3rd best team in the CL, now our MF under Lucho wasn't bad at all :lol:
 

serghei

Senior Member
People are criminally underrating our midfield in Lucho 1st 2 years,Raki and Iniesta were critical and not just providing control, CL 1st goal is huge example of how much this midfield played a part, Iniesta assist against PSG too etc.
The brilliance of MSN made that midfield creativity go under the radar tbh, later on Iniesta lost a step, Raki struggled with both fatigue and with basically new role at right side when Messi moved to the inside again.

Don't think so. Creatively, the midfield had a pretty low profile role. The front 3 basically scored all the goals almost and also they mostly provided the killer passes to themselves (less so Neymar who finished more chances than he created for the other two). I'd say Alves was the next player with the most creativity in that team in 2015, more than any of the midfielders. Midfield was fine, but not decisive at all overall. The MSN was the difference in almost all games.

City away it was mostly the Suarez show. City at home it was all Messi embarassing them and setting up Neymar for god knows how many 1 vs 1 misses. PSG win was all Suarez and Neymar with Messi as the key passer in what was tie over in first game. Bayern at home it was Messi with 2 goals 1 assist, very much a legendary Messi performance. Neymar 1 goal after the ball went through Suarez and Messi prior. Bayern away it was Messi with 2 killer passes to Neymar who then squared for a Suarez double that saw the tie off.

I think it's a mistake to not view that season as mostly dominated by one of the best front trios ever seen, playing in complete understanding of each others at the peak of their game. Let's face it, 99.9% of the managers don't get to have a strike force like that in their team. When at least two of the three were in a great mood it smelled like trouble for the opponent.
 
Last edited:

xXKonan

Senior Member
It took a bit for Iniesta to finally gel with Rakitic that season.

I remember Xavi-Rakitic being a pretty good pair when they played together.
 

serghei

Senior Member
It took a bit for Iniesta to finally gel with Rakitic that season.

I remember Xavi-Rakitic being a pretty good pair when they played together.

Yea, and even when it happened, they had a lot more defensive roles while the creativity was mostly left to the front three and Alves who played more like a winger in that season, with Rakitic covering for him in defense. Even Iniesta complained at some point that he had to adapt to a new role, with more defensive roles, as Neymar wasn't a Pedro like winger who did a lot of work in defense.
 

Barcilliant

Senior Member
Watched City vs Southampton live. If the play us in Cl we will be torn apart. So much speed and movement. The team is so well drilled and synchronised.

Even without DeBruyne City looked immense. It doesn't matter who plays the team essentially plays the same football. Ncontrast this with Valverde and our slow, static up and down style of play.

Valverde is not even good enough for Valencia or Sevilla let alone Barca.
 

FinBarcelonafan

Well-known member
Watched City vs Southampton live. If the play us in Cl we will be torn apart. So much speed and movement. The team is so well drilled and synchronised.

Even without DeBruyne City looked immense. It doesn't matter who plays the team essentially plays the same football. Ncontrast this with Valverde and our slow, static up and down style of play.

Valverde is not even good enough for Valencia or Sevilla let alone Barca.

Exactly. City is like the new and better version of Barca. If they had Messi there would be nothing stopping them.n
 

Messigician

Senior Member
Watched City vs Southampton live. If the play us in Cl we will be torn apart. So much speed and movement. The team is so well drilled and synchronised.

Even without DeBruyne City looked immense. It doesn't matter who plays the team essentially plays the same football. Ncontrast this with Valverde and our slow, static up and down style of play.

Valverde is not even good enough for Valencia or Sevilla let alone Barca.

You know they lost to Lyon right? City are far from invincible
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top