Etoo wAs also third in 2005 (or was it 2006) ik the ballon dor. After dinho and lampard
He was 3rd for the FIFA World best player of the year.
Etoo wAs also third in 2005 (or was it 2006) ik the ballon dor. After dinho and lampard
Suarez. Eto'o is comically overrated on this forum.
Suarez. Eto'o is comically overrated on this forum.
Yeah, its weird really like Suarez beat Messi and ronaldo to golden boot WITHOUT penalties mental stat
Suarez. Eto'o is comically overrated on this forum.
Go and check ?too's stats with Bar?a before talking. Suarez was a great player but Eto'o did more for Bar?a and it's a fact.
144 appearances and 108 goals
Suarez
198 appearances and 147 goals
So Suarez had more appearances and more goals
If these numbers are real, now I have the confirmation Eto'o was really better thanks bro. Still have a better goals ratio in La Liga while Suarez was playing in a more prolific Barcelona team with more ball possession and better players around just with him as the only striker. It just proves that Eto'o would score more. Eto'o has more versatility, more speed and technique than Luis Suarez.
Eto'o was the main man
Suarez shared with MSN and still scored more lol
You clearly didn't watch that 2004-2008 Bar?a team. Let me refresh your mind. The team of Rijkaard played with a front 3 with Ronaldinho, Eto'o and Giuly (or Messi). We also had Henrick Larsson who played almost each game as a substitute. Eto'o used to go on the side in each game just because he wasn't the targetman, he permutatted with Ronaldinho, Giuly, Messi, Larsson etc... If I Ask you which position Eto'o played for his 2 CL finals, are you going to answer as a CF ? No way, in Paris 2006 he was LW and in Roma 2009 he was RW. That's the reality. Suarez was the only striker of Barcelona because Messi became more like a number 10, and Neymar used to stay on his side even if he could score goals.
This is funny
I'm arguing with someone called etoshow
Like he isn't going to be biased lmfao
Waste of time