Lightweight schoolboy, will get bullied in CL
5'11" is too short to be a workhorse
Since this is trolling regarding my ideas, fine.
I see that some things are too complicated for you guys.
You are constantly:
1. looking only at an attacking part of football, while football is played in 2 directions: attacking and defending
2. AND, you are looking at a player vs player, 1 by 1 or 1 vs 1, instead of looking at midfield as a unit
Further, I don't have anything against Frenkie. I like him now.
I did write concerns though when he had 2-3 poor games against Germany NT team and Bayern and he was neutralized by them.
Regarding this post in particular:
Lightweight schoolboy, will get bullied in CL
Again, you need to look at A TEAM or MIDFIELD as a UNIT.
Some of you guys now probably think that Ajax is playing good because:
1. of De Jong
2. and because of their attacking oriented technical football
But not too many people are mentioning their physical skills and defending, which are
ALSO all world class.
So, for an average football fan:
= Ajax is good because of technique and an attacking football
But, if you dig deeper, they are actually good because of:
= young, physically strong and very fit players
= awesome technique, off the ball movement and attack
= but also awesome defending, as single players or as a unit
Now, sorry if I am wrong, but I have an impression that an average fan here thinks in this way:
1. De Jong plays awesome for Ajax both as a defender and as midfielder contributing in attack
= so, at Barca, he will be able to do the same, or he will be even better
But, there is one problem which a lot of guys don't see.
The problem is that Ajax's midfield has 3 players who both have:
1. a nice physique
2. are good in attacking part
3. are good in defending
So, De Jong-Schone-Van De Beek has not too much in common with mighty combinations: Frenkie-Arthur-Alena/Puig, lol.
Why?
Well, now you'll see why:
1. so, even if Frenkie is not the strongest physical beast (he is ok, though), he is surrounded in midfield by 2 quite strong (and YET technical guys) in:
Van De Beek 183 cm
Schone 178 cm
So, Ajax's midfield is forming a trio of 3 guys of: 183cm, 181cm and 178cm height.
Now, if you want to compare it with a mighty wet dream Frenkie-Arthur-Puig trio, we would have:
181cm (Frenkie), Arthur 171cm, Puig 169cm.
Do you already see a problem?
At Ajax, Frenkie is one of 3 guys, who are more or less ALL good in physique.
And Frenkie is neither the strongest part (in terms of physique) in that trio, nor the weakest link.
He is one out of 3 well balanced guys (physique, technique, defending).
At Barca, on the other hand, in a mighty Arthur-Puig-Frenkie trio, Frenkie is suddenly THE ONLY somewhat stronger (and taller) guy who will have to cover for defensive and physical flaws of other two guys.
So, imo, De Beek-Schone-Frenkie has nothing in common with Frenkie-Arthur-Puig.
2. so, I have explained physical problems of a potential Frenkie-Arthur-Puig trio.
In attack, they are fine, as expected, since Barca fans are looking only at that area of football, lol.
Let's check the 3rd area now: defending.
This is how 3 Ajax's midfielders defended in a CL this season:
Tackles:
Frenkie 2,2 per match
De Beek 1,9
Schone 1,8
Interceptions:
Frenkie 1,7 per match
Schone 1,6
De Beek 1,0
Clearances:
Frenkie 1,5 per match
Schone 1,2
De Beek 0,6
So, on average:
Midfielders of Ajax will make:
5,9 tackles per match Champions league's match
4,3 interceptions per match
3,3 clearances per match
Now again, if we pick Frenkie-Arthur-Puig midfield, these will be our numbers:
** There are no stats for Puig since he didn't play, but due to his physique and due to his nature of being a more attacking minded midfielder than Arthur, let's assume that he will have weaker defensive numbers than Arthur.
So, our potential trio:
Tackles:
Frenkie 2,2
Arthur 1,5
** Puig, let's say 0,6 per match
Interceptions:
Frenkie 1,7
Arthur 0,3
** Puig, let's say 0,2 per match
Clearances:
Frenkie 1,5
Arthur 0,4
** Puig, let's say 0,2 per match
And then you have:
TOTAL Ajax:
5,9 tackles per match Champions league's match
4,3 interceptions per match
3,3 clearances per match
Total Barca:
4,3 tackles
2,2 interceptions
2,1 clearances
Or Ajax vs Barca midfield:
Tackles: 5,9 vs 4,3
Interceptions: 4,3 vs 2,2
Clearances: 3,3 vs 2,1
Total: 13,5 vs 8,6
Basically, a current Ajax's midfield will have around 80% more defensive contributions than our potential Frenkie-Arthur-Puig trio.
I mean, you can laugh all you want at workhorses, but out of 3 best teams in a CL this season, Barca, Liverpool and Ajax, this is a height of their midfield players:
Busquets 189cm
Fabinho 188cm
Henderson 182cm
Rakitic 184cm
Van De Beek 183cm
Frenkie 181cm
------------------
Schone 178cm
Wijnaldum 175cm
Arthur 171cm
Basically, all 3 teams have only 1 guy in midfield who is shorter than 180cm.
Even Real who won 4 CL titles lately had: Casemiro 185, Kroos 183, Modric 172.
This is 2019, days of short midfield combinations are gone. Football is more athletic and physical in each new year.
You need to run, cover, tackle more and more in each new season.
Anyway, in La Liga, we can play in all crazy combinations because Spanish teams are lighter, short and not so strong physically as (Northern) European teams.
So, Arthur-Puig/Alena/Coutinho might play well against Getafe, Girona and similar.
But, you'll see, you guys will laugh less and less in a future to a workhorse theory in CL knockout matches, World cup knockout matches, Euros knockout matches and similar.
In those matches, you need: physique, technique (and attacking skills in general) and defending.
While here majority of posters don't "get": what is wrong with Coutinho-Arthur midfield duo?
Or why couldn't we play Frenkie-Arthur-Puig/Alena trio in a CL?
People will always reply: it worked with Xavi and Iniesta, lol. (The best team ever on their prime, paired with prime Messi to save their asses and flaws and happened 10 years ago in a less physical world of football).