Hmm
Since Overmars took over as Ajax sporting director:
-We have allowed them to get Bojan & Cuenca in loan for free with friendly terms.
-In return, Overmars hijacked our deal to Davinson after it was announced, signed our youth GK and agreed terms behind our back. and trolled us at the end of transfer market.
-The only deal that happened between the two clubs with players coming to our side was Cillessen, who overstayed his time in Ajax and was sold for a fee that made him one of the top 10 most expensive GKs in history at that time. So more than fair deal to Ajax actually.
Overmars is all about business, there is nothing there to damage and we will be at fault if we even thought that "cultivating this historic relationship" will do us any favour. At the end when they decide to sell player it will be the one with most profitable offer that will likely get that player.
I fail to see the irrelevance to what I said
I did not state that relations are deteriorating and I am aware of all the examples that you have mentioned and I don't disagree. All I am saying is that it would be wise to keep this historical relationship close-knitted given the talent pool in the Netherlands and Ajax Amsterdam in particular.
Davinson eventually preferred a move to Ajax Amsterdam rather than a stint at Barça B in the Segunda División. I can't blame him for that. Nor is there such a thing as "hijacking" in professional football. Every club is hijacking transfer targets of other clubs each transfer window and outside of the transfer windows. No need to mention Malcom and 100's of other examples. He was just the most clear/most talked about example of such behavior this summer.
I don't recall the Onana situation in detail but from what I recall Onana himself wanted to move already in the summer of 2014 with 1 year left of his contract but the club refused to sell him. Instead he signed a deal with Ajax the following January (completely legal and what we are trying to do with Rabiot if rumors are to be taken for granted). I don't see any "behind the back" dealings here.
My comment was not about me thinking that Ajax, because we have close ties to them and vice versa historically, would refuse to sell De Jong to Man City or PSG if both those oil clubs (gas in the case of QSG) owned by primitive dictatorships were to make much higher bids. Just that Barça is a natural choice for many youngsters in Ajax and in particular for a player of De Jong's profile and that this should work in our favor.
Also let us be honest. The pathetic boards behavior (like with so many other clubs in the past hence our damaged/not optimal realtions with numerous top clubs in Europe) towards Ajax Amsterdam this summer (if media reports are to be believed) and constant media reports (no doubt that the board had a role to play here given the relationship between Mundo Deportivo and the current board for instance) that were attempting to destabilize Ajax and help force De Jong away from Ajax. Not to mention our frankly insulting offers (apparently).
Anyway all this is a part of the game and many other clubs other than Barça are doing it. Ajax are most likely using similar tactics against smaller clubs in the Netherlands. So I am not "crying" about it. Just saying that your examples are biased or at least Ajax can say the same about Barça throughout the years and probably more examples. However as stated, I agree with your underlining point which is that there will be no presents just because of a historical relationship between both clubs.