He wasn't good, Zanela. He did fuck up a lot of things, even missed great chances.
But he scores and does the same what he did at Real in the first half of the season: play mediocre or bad and cover that up with goals. Therefore he gets credited by me, but that doesn't make he played a good game. He can do a lot better, even if he scores less.
But he scored three times so I have nothing on my side because the winner takes it all. Even if he was the worst player of the attack.
How many strikers convert all their given chances in a match?...Doesn't happen even to the most profile strikers in the game. So if he did miss a couple, it's not something he deserves to be criticised for.
Neither is it imperative for a striker to score + do everything else right. Although he really wasn't as bad as ur suggesting. Your parameters to judge his performances are ridiculously biased and we both know why.
As for being the worst attacking player, he was better than Di Maria who despite improving on his earlier match was still subpar.
Last edited: