Semi-Neutral
Sir Alupp Heynrguson
People keep saying league is harder to win but how many teams have more CL titles than league titles?
I would trade 2 leagues for 1 CL.
Yeah, but there has been a lot fewer CLs than leagues.
People keep saying league is harder to win but how many teams have more CL titles than league titles?
I would trade 2 leagues for 1 CL.
Yeah, but there has been a lot fewer CLs than leagues.
LOOL The CL has all the teams facing Each Other. While the league has maybe 1 or 2 other good teams... therefore increasing the likeliness of winning... but not the ease.... As in the CL you sometimes can be drawn against 2 sometimes 3 average teams which are beatable. In a league you face everybody, twice. Easy medium and difficult matches.People keep saying league is harder to win but how many teams have more CL titles than league titles?
LOOL The CL has all the teams facing Each Other. While the league has maybe 1 or 2 other good teams... therefore increasing the likeliness of winning... but not the ease.... As in the CL you sometimes can be drawn against 2 sometimes 3 average teams which are beatable. In a league you face everybody, twice. Easy medium and difficult matches.
It's easier for an unfavoured side to win the CL than it is for an unfavoured side to win the PL. The CL favourites at the start of the year rarely end up winning the CL, but the PL favourites generally tend to win or come very close.
So to conclude, if you're the best side, it's easier to win a league competition. If you're not, the CL is more likely to be your best chance of silverware.
NONE, the league is the true test.
CL a bit of luck here and there and you end up winning it
Good post Raed. Context matters when we're talking about what fans yearn for.
Your definition of 'hard' and my definition are apparently different. The league takes more effort (hard work - is this what you're talking about?) because it has 38 games. The CL is harder to win because one mistake and you're out. There are numerous examples of teams that won their league but failed to win the CL that year (guaranteed 4-5 teams every year) while there are only a few examples when a team won the CL but failed to win the league that year.
Smart. The league is the true test of what? How to thrash Rayo 6-0 instead of 4-0? You make it sound like anybody can win the CL with a bit of luck. Yes of course the league has a lesser margin of error when it comes to whether a team deserved to win or not, but at the end of the day, the league only tells you that you're the best in your own country. Which is not comparable to being the best in Europe.
Except is Liverpool a force at all? They won the CL in 2005 and they are pretty much a terrible team up until this season where they benefited from lack of European football. Leagues build football culture, builds a sustainable system, builds a fan base, builds for the future, the CL is nothing but a cherry on top. There is a lot of prestige that comes with it but it is not a true test of the years.
Juventus have won 5 European titles (or 4?) and they maintained their existence due to the league wins. Barca, maintained their existance through winning the league because your European performance was garbage. Inter Milan won the treble and that didn't do then any good because their team was built to win the CL, not to last the ages. So yes, the league is a true test of endurance, it is a true test in the sense that a draw can be considered a loss. It is a true test for managers, not on a tactical level only, but on their human management as well.
Since the CL was introduced in 1992, 13 different teams have won it. Here's a comparison of the CLs won vs league titles won since 1992 for those 13 teams:
Real Madrid - 4 CL, 7 leagues
Barcelona - 3 CL, 10 leagues
AC Milan - 3 CL, 6 leagues
Bayern Munich - 2 CL, 12 leagues
Manchester United - 2 CL, 13 leagues
FC Porto - 1 CL, 15 leagues
Ajax - 1 CL, 10 leagues
Juventus - 1 CL, 8 leagues
Inter Milan - 1 CL, 5 leagues
Borussia Dortmund - 1 CL, 5 leagues
Chelsea - 1 CL, 3 leagues
Marseille - 1 CL, 1 league
Liverpool - 1 CL, 0 league
Total - 22 CL, 95 leagues
Only Liverpool has won more CLs than leagues since 1992 while Marseille has equal number of CL and league wins.
I'm pretty sure this trend will be prevalent if you extrapolate the data using European Cup wins and league wins from pre-1992 years.
Juve only have two CL's.
Since the CL was introduced in 1992, 13 different teams have won it. Here's a comparison of the CLs won vs league titles won since 1992 for those 13 teams:
Real Madrid - 4 CL, 7 leagues
Barcelona - 3 CL, 10 leagues
AC Milan - 3 CL, 6 leagues
Bayern Munich - 2 CL, 12 leagues
Manchester United - 2 CL, 13 leagues
FC Porto - 1 CL, 15 leagues
Ajax - 1 CL, 10 leagues
Juventus - 1 CL, 8 leagues
Inter Milan - 1 CL, 5 leagues
Borussia Dortmund - 1 CL, 5 leagues
Chelsea - 1 CL, 3 leagues
Marseille - 1 CL, 1 league
Liverpool - 1 CL, 0 league
Total - 22 CL, 95 leagues
Only Liverpool has won more CLs than leagues since 1992 while Marseille has equal number of CL and league wins.
I'm pretty sure this trend will be prevalent if you extrapolate the data using European Cup wins and league wins from pre-1992 years.