Experience is overrated and is such a cliche
There's only one way for good young players to get experience.
What he's really talking about isn't experience, its quality, and England didn't have enough of that while Croatia did.
Croatia had Modric and Rakitic on every tournament since 2008'.
And majority of time, Croatia were losing in a naive manner, even though they were better.
They didn't know how to get a few extra inches/percentages of performance in key moments.
Please, watch these highligts:
You have a 23 years old Modric and a 20 years old Rakitic as Croatia's midfield duo in 1/4s of Euros 2008 vs Turkey.
Look at how the extra time will end, in such a naive way:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXq13PjO-FQ
Look at this, BOTH young Modric and Rakitic missed the whole goal in a penalty shootout...
And then, you have matches, like against Portugal in 2016, more chances, dominating but unable to kill the match and then being defeated in the 117th minute:
So, Croatia went from a team who is usually better BUT can't win matches to a team which is turning every match from 0:1 into their favor, scoring in extra times, winning on penalties and everything.
Do you think that 23&20 years old Modric&Rakitic would have been able to turn matches from 0:1 to 2:1 and score crucial extra time and penalty kick goals?
I don't think so.
Modric and Rakitic needed to lose 10s of key matches before they have reached a current mental strength/experience level.
Their technique was always there, but experience and mental strenght wasn't.
1. technique is a skill
2. mental strength is a skill
3. experience is a skill
4. IQ is a skill
5. physique is a skill
On our forum, we usually rate players only whether they have a good technique/passing and nothing more.
We don't look too much at IQ, mental strength, experience or physique.
As long as he knows how to pass and has silky touches, he "should be fine".
Well, those days are over.