Here are the reason for Barto win and Laporta loss:
Barto
1. The team won the treble
2. His willingness to call elections when he could easily and legitimately continue for another 2 years. He called the election when the club wasn't in the best form. It was a gamble for Barto
3. While Rossel is hugely unpopular, Bart never tried to distance himself from him to get more votes, however he quietly got rid of all Rosell executives.
4.Did not pay insane amount of money to buy Pogba to get election boost.
5. Showed that he close the "deal"(Messi is happy, Alves and Pedro got renewed, bought Suarez, considered LE-s preferences when buying new players)
Laporta
1. Not having any substance to his campaign. He thought he will get elected just because he is Laporta
2. Abusing cheap populist tricks to get elected(Unicef, Abidal)
3.Talking about how he is going to fix La Masia, making sure that youngsters will have a chance in first team and promising at the same time he will bring Pogba(Beckham 2.0?)
4.Slamming Barto for the fraud while he was involved in dubious deals himself(soci-s been with club for longer time and have obviously have better memory than some fans in this forum).
5. He had no fresh ideas, out of touch,looked impulsive and inconsistent.
I'm not big fan of Barto(not big fan of any administrative exec), but I'm happy that Laporta is not the president. I was happy when he stepped down after his first term(not because I liked Sandro), this election just showed that I wasn't wrong about his character.